Germany: Geography, Customs, and People
This treatise was written in the year of Rome 851, A.D. 98; during the fourth consulate of the emperor Nerva, and the third of Trajan.
1. Germany is separated from Gaul, Rhaetia, and Pannonia, by the rivers Rhine and Danube; from Sarmatia and Dacia, by mountains and mutual dread. The rest is surrounded by an ocean, embracing broad promontories and vast insular tracts, in which our military expeditions have lately discovered various nations and kingdoms. The Rhine, issuing from the inaccessible and precipitous summit of the Rhaetic Alps, bends gently to the west, and falls into the Northern Ocean. The Danube, poured from the easy and gently raised ridge of Mount Abnoba, visits several nations in its course, till at length it bursts out by six channels into the Pontic sea; a seventh is lost in marshes.
1. Germany is separated from Gaul, Rhaetia, and Pannonia, by the Rhine and Danube rivers. Mountains and mutual fear separate Germany from Sarmatia and Dacia. The rest is surrounded by an ocean that encircles broad headlands and vast stretches of islands. Among these, our military expeditions have recently discovered various nations and kingdoms. The Rhine rises on the steep, inaccessible summit of the Rhaetic Alps. The river curves gently westward and flows into the Northern Ocean. The Danube rises on the low, gently sloping ridge of Mount Abnoba. The river flows through several nations before finally rushing out through six channels into the Pontic sea. A seventh channel disappears into marshes.
Germany here refers to the land beyond the Rhine. Germania Cisrhenana was divided into Upper and Lower Germania and was part of Gallia Belgica.
Rhaetia included the Grisons and parts of Suabia and Bavaria.
Lower Hungary and part of Austria.
The Carpathian mountains in Upper Hungary.
"Broad promontories." Latos sinus. Sinus strictly means "a bending," especially inwards. From this meaning, the word came to describe a gulf or bay of the sea. Then, through metonymy, it came to mean the projecting land that forms a gulf, and later any promontory or peninsula. Here, the word has this last meaning and refers especially to the Danish peninsula. See Livy xxvii, 30, xxxviii. 5. Servius on Virgil, Aen. xi. 626.
The Romans knew very little about Scandinavia and Finland and believed they were islands.
The mountains of the Grisons. The mountain where the Rhine begins is now called Vogelberg.
Now called Schwartzwald, or the Black Forest. The river was called Danubius from its source to Vindobona (Vienna). Along the rest of its course, the river was called Ister.
Donec erumpat. The term erumpat is especially accurate and vivid. For the Danube flows into the Euxine with such force that its course can be clearly traced miles out to sea.
There are now only five.
2. The people of Germany appear to me indigenous, and free from intermixture with foreigners, either as settlers or casual visitants. For the emigrants of former ages performed their expeditions not by land, but by water; and that immense, and, if I may so call it, hostile ocean, is rarely navigated by ships from our world. Then, besides the danger of a boisterous and unknown sea, who would relinquish Asia, Africa, or Italy, for Germany, a land rude in its surface, rigorous in its climate, cheerless to every beholder and cultivator, except a native? In their ancient songs, which are their only records or annals, they celebrate the god Tuisto, sprung from the earth, and his son Mannus, as the fathers and founders of their race. To Mannus they ascribe three sons, from whose names the people bordering on the ocean are called Ingaevones; those inhabiting the central parts, Herminones; the rest, Istaevones. Some, however, assuming the licence of antiquity, affirm that there were more descendants of the god, from whom more appellations were derived; as those of the Marsi, Gambrivii, Suevi, and Vandali; and that these are the genuine and original names. That of Germany, on the other hand, they assert to be a modern addition; for that the people who first crossed the Rhine, and expelled the Gauls, and are now called Tungri, were then named Germans; which appellation of a particular tribe, not of a whole people, gradually prevailed; so that the title of Germans, first assumed by the victors in order to excite terror, was afterwards adopted by the nation in general. They have likewise the tradition of a Hercules of their country, whose praises they sing before those of all other heroes as they advance to battle.
2. The people of Germany seem to me to be native to the land, without foreign ancestry from settlers or occasional visitors. For in earlier ages, migrants traveled not by land but by sea. And that vast and, if I may call it so, hostile ocean rarely sees ships from our world. Besides the danger of a rough and unknown sea, who would leave Asia, Africa, or Italy for Germany? Its landscape is rough, its climate harsh, and it offers no cheer to anyone viewing or farming it, except a native. In their ancient songs, their only records or histories, they celebrate the earth-born god Tuisto and his son Mannus. They regard these two as the fathers and founders of their race. They say Mannus had three sons, whose names gave the coastal people their name, Ingaevones. The people of the central regions are called Herminones, and the rest, Istaevones. Some, however, take the freedom that ancient history allows and claim the god had more descendants. From these descendants came further names, such as Marsi, Gambrivii, Suevi, and Vandali. They claim these are the true, original names. The name Germany, on the other hand, they claim, is a recent addition. The people who first crossed the Rhine and drove out the Gauls are now called Tungri. At that time, however, they were called Germans. This name originally belonged to one tribe, not the whole people, but gradually spread. The victors first adopted the name Germans to inspire terror, and afterward the nation as a whole adopted it. They also have a tradition of a Hercules from their own country. As they advance into battle, they sing his praises before those of all other heroes.
Ancient writers called all peoples indigenae (i.e. inde geniti), or autochthones, "sprung from the soil," when the writers did not know those peoples’ origins.
However, it is well established that the ancestors of the Germans migrated overland from Asia. Tacitus makes a very common mistake here. He assumes that a local fact (how migrations occurred in the Mediterranean basin) reflects a general rule. ED.
Drusus was the father of the emperor Claudius. He was the first Roman general to sail the German Ocean. The difficulties and dangers Germanicus faced in storms on this sea are described in the Annals, ii. 23.
All barbarous nations, in every age, have used poetry for the same purpose, as North American Indians still do. Eginhart tells us that Charlemagne "wrote out and committed to memory barbarous verses of great antiquity, in which the actions and wars of ancient kings were recorded."
The scholar Leibnitz supposes that Tuisto was Teut or Teutates, so famous throughout Gaul and Spain. Teut was a Celto-Scythian king or hero who conquered and civilized much of Europe and Asia. Various other theories concern Tuisto and his son Mannus, but most are extremely vague and improbable. Among these is the idea that Mannus and his three sons preserve a faint tradition of Adam and his sons Cain, Abel, and Seth. Alternatively, they may preserve a tradition of Noah and his sons Shem, Ham, and Japhet.
Conringius interprets the names of Mannus’s sons as Ingäff, Istäf, and Hermin.
Pliny, iv. 14, takes a middle position between these views and lists five main tribes. The Vindili include the Burgundiones, Varini, Carini, and Guttones. The Ingaevones include the Cimbri, Teutoni, and Chauci. The Istaevones live near the Rhine and include the inland Cimbri. The Hermiones include the Suevi, Hermunduri, Catti, and Cherusci. The Peucini and Bastarnae border the Dacians.
The Marsi appear to have occupied different parts of northwestern Germany at different times. Under Tiberius (A.D. 14), the forces of Germanicus slaughtered many of them. Germanicus devastated their country for fifty miles with fire and sword, sparing no one, regardless of age or sex. He spared neither sacred nor secular things. (See Ann. i. 51.) At this time, the Marsi occupied the area near the Rura (Ruhr), a tributary of the Rhine. This slaughter probably destroyed the Marsi as a separate people. By the time Trajan became emperor, they seem to have disappeared from among the Germanic tribes. Their name therefore does not appear in the following account of Germany.
Strabo mentions these people in vii. 1, 3. Where they lived is not very easy to determine.
See the note, c. 38.
The Vandals are said to have taken their name from the German word wendeln, "to wander." They began causing trouble for the Romans in A.D. 160, during the reigns of Aurelius and Verus. In A.D. 410 they conquered Spain alongside the Alans and Suevi. The Vandals received a share of Spain that was named Vandalusia (Andalusia) after them. In A.D. 429 they crossed into Africa under Genseric. He conquered Byzacium, Gaetulia, and part of Numidia, but also crossed into Italy in A.D. 455 and plundered Rome. After Genseric's death, Vandal power declined.
That is, the names of the Marsi, Gambrivii, etc. Ingaevones, Istaevones, and Hermiones were not so much names of peoples as terms describing where they lived. According to the most learned Germans, the Ingaevones are die Inwohner, those living inward, toward the sea. The Istaevones are die Westwohner, the inhabitants of the western regions. The Hermiones are die Herumwohner, the inhabitants of the central regions.
However, it appears in an inscription dating as far back as the year of Rome 531, before Christ 222. The inscription records Claudius Marcellus’s victory over the Galli Insubres and their allies the Germans at Clastidium. Clastidium is now Chiastezzo in the Milanese.
A passage in Caesar, Bell. Gall. ii. 4, illustrates this. Caesar mentions that several of the Belgae descended from Germans who had crossed the Rhine and expelled the Gauls. He then says, "the first of these emigrants were the Condrusii, Eburones, Caeresi and Paemani, who were called by the common name of Germans." German derives from Wehr mann, a warrior, or man of war. The victorious Cisrhenane tribes first used this name, but the whole Transrhenane nation did not use it until later. They gradually adopted the name, considering it equally deserved because of their military reputation. The Tungri were once a renowned people. Traces of their former importance remain in the size of the district now called the ancient diocese of Tongres.
Under this name, Tacitus refers to a German deity with attributes largely matching those of the Greek and Roman Hercules. What the Germans called this deity is uncertain. White.
3. A peculiar kind of verses is also current among them, by the recital of which, termed "barding," they stimulate their courage; while the sound itself serves as an augury of the event of the impending combat. For, according to the nature of the cry proceeding from the line, terror is inspired or felt: nor does it seem so much an articulate song, as the wild chorus of valor. A harsh, piercing note, and a broken roar, are the favorite tones; which they render more full and sonorous by applying their mouths to their shields. Some conjecture that Ulysses, in the course of his long and fabulous wanderings, was driven into this ocean, and landed in Germany; and that Asciburgium, a place situated on the Rhine, and at this day inhabited, was founded by him, and named Askipurgion. They pretend that an altar was formerly discovered here, consecrated to Ulysses, with the name of his father Laertes subjoined; and that certain monuments and tombs, inscribed with Greek characters, are still extant upon the confines of Germany and Rhaetia. These allegations I shall neither attempt to confirm nor to refute: let every one believe concerning them as he is disposed.
3. They also have a distinctive kind of verse, whose recital, called "barding," stirs their courage. The sound itself serves as an omen of the coming battle’s outcome. Depending on the cry from the battle line, they either inspire terror or feel it themselves. The cry seems less a song with distinct words than a wild chorus of courage. They favor a harsh, piercing note and a broken roar. They make these sounds fuller and more resonant by holding their mouths against their shields. Some suppose that Ulysses, during his long, legendary wanderings, was driven into this ocean and landed in Germany. They also believe he founded Asciburgium, a settlement on the Rhine still inhabited today, and named it Askipurgion. They claim that an altar dedicated to Ulysses was once discovered there, with his father Laertes’ name inscribed beneath his. They also claim that certain monuments and tombs inscribed with Greek letters still survive along Germany’s border with Rhaetia. I shall try neither to confirm nor to refute these claims. Let everyone believe what they choose about them.
Quem barditum vocant. The word barditus is Gallic in origin, derived from bardi, "bards;" among the Gauls, bards customarily accompanied the army. They celebrated the heroic deeds of great warriors. Thus, barditum would mean "the fulfilment of the bard's office." Clearly, then, barditum cannot be correct here. Among the Germans, the whole army sang the war-song, not a specially appointed group. Some editions give baritum, said to derive from the German beren, or baeren, "to shout;" some dictionaries therefore translate it as "the German war-song." However, the following passage from Facciolati suggests that German critics reject this explanation: "De barito clamore bellico, seu, ut quaedam habent exemplaria, bardito, nihil audiuimus nunc in Germaniâ: nisi hoc dixerimus, quòd bracht, vel brecht, milites Germani appellare consueverunt; concursum videlicet certantium, et clamorem ad pugnam descendentium; quem bar, bar, bar, sonuisse nonnulli affirmant." (Andr. Althameri, Schol. in C. Tacit De Germanis.)
Ritter, himself German, declares that the reading baritus is worthless. He also states that barritus did not name the ancient German war-song. Instead, it named the shout raised by Romans in later times just before battle. He derives it "a clamore barrorem, i.e. elephantorum." Ritter also believes that "quem barditum vocant" began as a marginal note by an unreliable scholar. A copyist then incorporated the note into his manuscript's text, allowing the error to spread. Ritter therefore puts the words in brackets to show that, in his judgment, Tacitus did not write them. White.
A striking parallel to the ancient German belief that war-cries or songs could predict the outcome appears in this passage. It comes from the Life of Sir Ewen Cameron, in "Pennant's Tour," 1769, Append, p. 363. At the battle of Killicrankie, just before the fighting began, "he (Sir Ewen) commanded such of the Camerons as were posted near him to make a great shout, which being seconded by those who stood on the right and left, ran quickly through the whole army, and was returned by the enemy. But the noise of the muskets and cannon, with the echoing of the hills, made the Highlanders fancy that their shouts were much louder and brisker than those of the enemy, and Lochiel cried out, 'Gentlemen, take courage, the day is ours: I am the oldest commander in the army, and have always observed something ominous and fatal in such a dull, hollow and feeble noise as the enemy made in their shout, which prognosticates that they are all doomed to die by our hands this night; whereas ours was brisk, lively and strong, and shows we have vigor and courage.' These words, spreading quickly through the army, animated the troops in a strange manner. The event justified the prediction; the Highlanders obtained a complete victory."
Now Asburg in the county of Meurs.
The Greeks introduced their alphabet into Gaul through their colony at Marseilles. Ancient Gallic coins have many Greek letters in their inscriptions. According to Caesar, the Helvetians also used Greek letters. From there, Greek letters might easily have spread through trade to the neighboring Germans. Count Marsili and others have found monuments with Greek inscriptions in Germany, but these date from a later period.
4. I concur in opinion with those who deem the Germans never to have intermarried with other nations; but to be a race, pure, unmixed, and stamped with a distinct character. Hence a family likeness pervades the whole, though their numbers are so great: eyes stern and blue; ruddy hair; large bodies, powerful in sudden exertions, but impatient of toil and labor, least of all capable of sustaining thirst and heat. Cold and hunger they are accustomed by their climate and soil to endure.
4. I agree with those who believe the Germans have never intermarried with other nations. Instead, they are a pure, unmixed race with a distinct character. So, despite their great numbers, they all share a family likeness: fierce blue eyes, reddish hair, and large bodies, capable of powerful bursts of effort. But they have little endurance for hard work and are least able to withstand thirst and heat. Their climate and soil have accustomed them to enduring cold and hunger.
Tacitus mentions the Germans’ large size elsewhere, as do other authors. It seems that most Germans at that time were at least six feet tall. Germans are still considered among the tallest people in Europe.
5. The land, though varied to a considerable extent in its aspect, is yet universally shagged with forests, or deformed by marshes: moister on the side of Gaul, more bleak on the side of Norieum and Pannonia. It is productive of grain, but unkindly to fruit-trees. It abounds in flocks and herds, but in general of a small breed. Even the beeve kind are destitute of their usual stateliness and dignity of head: they are, however, numerous, and form the most esteemed, and, indeed, the only species of wealth. Silver and gold the gods, I know not whether in their favor or anger, have denied to this country. Not that I would assert that no veins of these metals are generated in Germany; for who has made the search? The possession of them is not coveted by these people as it is by us. Vessels of silver are indeed to be seen among them, which have been presented to their ambassadors and chiefs; but they are held in no higher estimation than earthenware. The borderers, however, set a value on gold and silver for the purpose of commerce, and have learned to distinguish several kinds of our coin, some of which they prefer to others: the remoter inhabitants continue the more simple and ancient usage of bartering commodities. The money preferred by the Germans is the old and well-known species, such as the Serrati and Bigati. They are also better pleased with silver than gold; not on account of any fondness for that metal, but because the smaller money is more convenient in their common and petty merchandise.
5. Though the land varies considerably in appearance, forests cover it everywhere, or marshes disfigure it. It is wetter on the side facing Gaul, bleaker on the side facing Norieum and Pannonia. The land produces grain, but is poorly suited to fruit trees. It has abundant flocks and herds, but the animals are generally small. Even the cattle lack their usual imposing appearance and noble heads. They are numerous, however, and are the most valued, indeed the only, form of wealth. The gods have denied this country silver and gold, whether as a favor or in anger, I cannot say. I would not claim, however, that Germany contains no veins of these metals. For who has searched? These people do not covet silver and gold as we do. Silver vessels can indeed be seen among them, presented as gifts to their ambassadors and chiefs. But they value these vessels no more than earthenware. Those living near the borders, however, value gold and silver for trade. They have learned to distinguish several kinds of our coins and prefer some to others. People farther inland continue the simpler, ancient practice of exchanging goods. The Germans prefer old, familiar coins, such as the Serrati and Bigati. They also prefer silver to gold. This is not because they are especially fond of silver. Rather, coins of lower value are more convenient for their everyday trade in small goods.
Bavaria and Austria.
The country was colder when covered with woods and marshes, making this observation more applicable then than now. Clearing and draining land has caused the same temperature change in North America. It may also be noted that, as we learn later, the Germans grew no crops except grain.
Cattle in some parts of Germany are now remarkably large. So their earlier small size must have resulted from poor care rather than the climate. They were not fed well, protected from harsh winters, or improved through crossbreeding.
Gold and silver mines have since been discovered in Germany. The gold mines are indeed insignificant, but the silver mines are valuable.
As vice and corruption spread among the Romans, their money contained more impure and cheaper metals. Thus Pliny, xxxiii. 3, reports that "Livius Drusus during his tribuneship, mixed an eighth part of brass with the silver coin;" and ibid. 9, "that Antony the triumvir mixed iron with the denarius: that some coined base metal, others diminished the pieces, and hence it became an art to prove the goodness of the denarii." One precaution against such fraud was to cut the edges like saw teeth. These cuts showed whether the coin was the same metal throughout or merely plated. Such coins were called Serrati, or serrated Denarii. The Bigati were stamped with a two-horse chariot, while the Quadrigati showed a four-horse chariot. These older coins contained purer silver than the emperors' coins. Thus the Germans preferred certain kinds of coins because they feared being cheated with counterfeit money.
The Romans had the same preference for silver coins, probably for the same reason originally. In the passage cited above, Pliny expresses surprise that "the Roman people had always imposed a tribute in silver on conquered nations; as at the end of the second Punic war, when they demanded an annual payment in silver for fifty years, without any gold."
6. Even iron is not plentiful among them; as may be inferred from the nature of their weapons. Swords or broad lances are seldom used; but they generally carry a spear, (called in their language framea, ) which has an iron blade, short and narrow, but so sharp and manageable, that, as occasion requires, they employ it either in close or distant fighting. This spear and a shield are all the armor of the cavalry. The foot have, besides, missile weapons, several to each man, which they hurl to an immense distance. They are either naked, or lightly covered with a small mantle; and have no pride in equipage: their shields only are ornamented with the choicest colors. Few are provided with a coat of mail; and scarcely here and there one with a casque or helmet. Their horses are neither remarkable for beauty nor swiftness, nor are they taught the various evolutions practised with us. The cavalry either bear down straight forwards, or wheel once to the right, in so compact a body that none is left behind the rest. Their principal strength, on the whole, consists in their infantry: hence in an engagement these are intermixed with the cavalry; so Well accordant with the nature of equestrian combats is the agility of those foot soldiers, whom they select from the whole body of their youth, and place in the front of the line. Their number, too, is determined; a hundred from each canton: and they are distinguished at home by a name expressive of this circumstance; so that what at first was only an appellation of number, becomes thenceforth a title of honor. Their line of battle is disposed in wedges. To give ground, provided they rally again, is considered rather as a prudent strategem, than cowardice. They carry off their slain even while the battle remains undecided. The greatest disgrace that can befall them is to have abandoned their shields. A person branded with this ignominy is not permitted to join in their religious rites, or enter their assemblies; so that many, after escaping from battle, have put an end to their infamy by the halter.
6. Even iron is scarce among them, as the nature of their weapons suggests. They seldom use swords or broad lances. Instead, they generally carry a spear (called framea in their language, ) with a short, narrow iron blade. The spear is so sharp and easy to handle that they use it for close or distant fighting as needed. This spear and a shield are the cavalry’s only armor. The infantry also carry throwing weapons, several per man, which they hurl enormous distances. The soldiers are either naked, or lightly covered with a small cloak. They take no pride in their equipment. Only their shields are decorated with the finest colors. Few have a coat of mail, and only a rare individual has a helmet. Their horses stand out neither for beauty nor for speed. Nor are the horses trained in the varied maneuvers practiced among us. The cavalry either charge straight ahead or make a single turn to the right. They move in such a tight formation that no rider falls behind. Overall, their main strength lies in their infantry. For this reason, infantry fight alongside the cavalry in battle. These foot soldiers are selected from all their young men and placed at the front of the battle line. Their agility makes them well suited to fighting alongside horsemen. Their number is also fixed: a hundred from each district. At home, they are known by a name that reflects this number. Thus, what began as a numerical label becomes a title of honor. Their battle line is arranged in wedges. Retreating, provided they rally again, is considered a sensible tactic rather than cowardice. They carry away their dead even while the battle’s outcome remains uncertain. The greatest disgrace they can suffer is to have abandoned their shields. Anyone marked by this shame is barred from taking part in religious rites or entering their assemblies. As a result, many who have escaped from battle have ended their disgrace by hanging themselves.
Iron was abundant underground. But these barbarous people lacked the patience, skill, and industry to mine and work it. They also used stone weapons, large numbers of which are found in ancient tombs and burial mounds.
This is thought to take its name from pfriem or priem, meaning the point of a weapon. Later, when iron became more plentiful, the Germans mainly used swords.
However, Tacitus's Annals, ii. 14, suggests these spears were too long to handle in fighting among trees and bushes.
Although warfare has changed greatly in modern times, ancient weapons are still in use. Like the ancients, we have two kinds of swords: pointed and edged (small sword and sabre). The broad lance survived until recently in the halberd. The spear and framea survived in the long pike and spontoon, and throwing weapons in the war hatchet, or North American tomahawk. Stone balls with holes through them are also found in old German burial mounds. These balls were thrown using thongs threaded through the holes.
Nudi. The Latin nudus, like the Greek gemnos, does not mean someone wearing no clothes at all. It means someone without an upper garment, wearing only a vest or tunic, perhaps a short one. White.
This decoration first marked the bearer's courage, then their noble status. Over time, it gave rise to the coats of arms so famous in the age of chivalry. Ordinary soldiers had plainly colored shields. Chieftains had shields painted with animal figures.
Plutarch, in his Life of Marius, gives a somewhat different account of the Cimbri’s weapons and equipment. "They wore (says he) helmets representing the heads of wild beasts, and other unusual figures, and crowned with a winged crest, to make them appear taller. They were covered with iron coats of mail, and carried white glittering shields. Each had a battle-axe; and in close fight they used large heavy swords." But the scholar Eccard rightly notes that the Cimbri had acquired these weapons during their march. For the Holsatian burial mounds of that period contain few bronze weapons and no iron ones. Instead, they contain stone spearheads and, in place of swords, wedge-shaped objects commonly called thunderbolts.
Casques (cassis) are made of metal. Helmets (galea) are made of leather. Isidorus.
Caesar describes this fighting method admirably. "The Germans engaged after the following manner:—There were 6,000 horse, and an equal number of the swiftest and bravest foot; who were chosen, man by man, by the cavalry, for their protection. By these they were attended in battle; to these they retreated; and, these, if they were hard pressed, joined them in the combat. If any fell wounded from their horses, by these they were covered. If it were necessary to advance or retreat to any considerable distance, such agility had they acquired by exercise, that, supporting themselves by the horses' manes, they kept pace with them." (Bell. Gall. i. 48.)
To understand this, note that the Germans were divided into nations or tribes, then into cantons, then districts or townships. They called the cantons (pagi in Latin) gauen. The districts or townships (vici) were called hunderte, from which the English term “hundreds” comes. According to the scholar Dithmar, these selected young men were called die hunderte, meaning “hundred men.” The following passage from Caesar suggests that the more powerful tribes selected more men from each canton. "The nation of the Suevi is by far the greatest and most warlike of the Germans. They are said to inhabit a hundred cantons; from each of which a thousand men are sent annually to make war out of their own territories. Thus neither the employments of agriculture, nor the use of arms are interrupted." Bell. Gall. iv. 1. The warriors were summoned by the heribannum, or army decree, from which the French arrière-ban is derived.
Vegetius (iii. 19,) describes a wedge as an infantry formation, narrow in front and widening toward the rear. This formation let soldiers break the enemy's ranks because all their weapons were aimed at one spot. The soldiers called the formation a boar's head.
Falsely accusing someone of this was also considered the gravest insult. Thus, the Salic law, tit. xxxiii, 5, imposes a fine of 600 denarii (about 9l.) upon "every free man who shall accuse another of throwing down his shield, and running away, without being able to prove it."
7. In the election of kings they have regard to birth; in that of generals, to valor. Their kings have not an absolute or unlimited power; and their generals command less through the force of authority, than of example. If they are daring, adventurous, and conspicuous in action, they procure obedience from the admiration they inspire. None, however, but the priests are permitted to judge offenders, to inflict bonds or stripes; so that chastisement appears not as an act of military discipline, but as the instigation of the god whom they suppose present with warriors. They also carry with them to battle certain images and standards taken from the sacred groves. It is a principal incentive to their courage, that their squadrons and battalions are not formed by men fortuitously collected, but by the assemblage of families and clans. Their pledges also are near at hand; they have within hearing the yells of their women, and the cries of their children. These, too, are the most revered witnesses of each man's conduct, these his most liberal applauders. To their mothers and their wives they bring their wounds for relief, nor do these dread to count or to search out the gashes. The women also administer food and encouragement to those who are fighting.
7. They choose kings for their ancestry and generals, for their courage. Their kings do not have absolute or unlimited power. Their generals lead less by authority than by example. If the generals are bold, adventurous, and stand out in battle, the admiration they inspire wins obedience. Only the priests, however, may judge offenders, put them in chains, or have them whipped. Punishment therefore seems not an act of military discipline, but the prompting of the god they believe accompanies their warriors. They also carry certain images and standards from the sacred groves into battle. A major source of their courage is that their cavalry units and infantry formations consist of families and clans. They are not made up of men gathered at random. Those dearest to them are also nearby. They can hear their women's shouts and their children's cries. These are the most respected witnesses of each man's conduct and the most generous in their praise. The men bring their wounds to their mothers and wives for treatment. The women do not shrink from counting or examining the gashes. The women also bring food and encouragement to those who are fighting.
Vertot (Mém. de l'Acad. des Inscrip.) suggests that the French maires du palais originated from these German military leaders. If kings were as distinguished for courage as for birth, they combined royal authority with military command. Usually, however, several kings and generals gathered for war. In such cases, the most distinguished leader commanded, with authority over all during war but not in peacetime. Thus Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi.) says, "In peace they have no common magistracy." A general was elected by being placed on a shield and lifted onto the shoulders of those standing nearby. The same ceremony was used to elect kings.
Thus Ambiorix, king of the Eburones, declared that "the nature of his authority was such, that the people had no less power over him, than he over the people." (Caesar, Bell. Gall. v.) The authority of North American chiefs was almost exactly the same.
Magistrates, however, held the power of life and death. As Caesar writes: "When a state engages either in an offensive or defensive war, magistrates are chosen to preside over it, and exercise power of life and death." (Bell. Gall. vi.) Priests were entrusted with carrying out punishments to make the punishments more solemn and less likely to provoke resentment.
Effigiesque et signa quaedam. Chapter ix. proves that effigies does not mean images of their deities. It states that they considered representing their deities in human form degrading to those deities. If human forms were degrading, we may argue, a fortiori, that forms of lower animals were too. The best explanation comes from Hist. iv. 22, where Tacitus says: "Depromptae silvis lucisve ferarum imagines, ut cuique genti inire praelium mos est." This suggests that these effigies and signa were images of wild animals used as national standards. The standards were kept with religious care in sacred woods and groves. They were brought out when the clan or tribe was about to go to war. White.
8. Tradition relates, that armies beginning to give way have been rallied by the females, through the earnestness of their supplications, the interposition of their bodies, and the pictures they have drawn of impending slavery, a calamity which these people bear with more impatience for their women than themselves; so that those states who have been obliged to give among their hostages the daughters of noble families, are the most effectually bound to fidelity. They even suppose somewhat of sanctity and prescience to be inherent in the female sex; and therefore neither despise their counsels, nor disregard their responses. We have beheld, in the reign of Vespasian, Veleda, long reverenced by many as a deity. Aurima, moreover, and several others, were formerly held in equal veneration, but not with a servile flattery, nor as though they made them goddesses.
8. Tradition tells us that women have rallied armies beginning to retreat. They have done so through urgent pleas, by placing their bodies in the way, and by describing the slavery ahead. These people find the thought of slavery harder to bear for their women than for themselves. So communities forced to give daughters of noble families as hostages are bound most firmly to remain loyal. They even believe that women have something sacred within them and some power to foresee the future. They therefore neither dismiss women's advice, nor ignore their prophetic answers. In Vespasian's reign, we ourselves saw Veleda, whom many had long revered as a deity. Aurima and several others, were once held in equal reverence. But this was not servile flattery, nor did their followers treat them as though making them goddesses.
The women not only stopped their husbands and sons from fleeing but also fought themselves in desperate situations. Women fought when Marius defeated the Cimbri (to be mentioned later). Dio also reports that Marcus Aurelius defeated the Marcomanni, Quadi, and other German allies. After that defeat, the bodies of women in armor were found among the dead.
Thus, in the army of Ariovistus, the women wept with their hair loose and disordered. They begged the soldiers not to let the Romans take them captive. Caesar, Bell. Gall. i.
A detail Suetonius mentions in his Life of Augustus is perhaps related to this. "From some nations he attempted to exact a new kind of hostages, women: because he observed that those of the male sex were disregarded." (Aug. xxi.)
See the same observation about Celtic women in Plutarch, on the virtues of women. The North Americans show similar respect for their women.
Caesar gives a striking example of this. "When he inquired of the captives the reason why Ariovistus did not engage, he learned, that it was because the matrons, who among the Germans are accustomed to pronounce, from their divinations, whether or not a battle will be favorable, had declared that they would not prove victorious, if they should fight before the new moon." Bell. Gall. i. Strabo describes the cruel way the Cimbrian women practiced divination: "The women who follow the Cimbri to war, are accompanied by gray-haired prophetesses, in white vestments, with canvas mantles fastened by clasps, a brazen girdle, and naked feet. These go with drawn swords through the camp, and, striking down those of the prisoners that they meet, drag them to a brazen kettle, holding about twenty amphorae. This has a kind of stage above it, ascending on which, the priestess cuts the throat of the victim, and, from the manner in which the blood flows into the vessel, judges of the future event. Others tear open the bodies of the captives thus butchered, and, from inspection of the entrails, presage victory to their own party." Lib. vii.
She was later captured by Rutilius Gallicus. Statius refers to her capture in his Sylvae, i. 4. Tacitus says more about her in his History, iv. 61.
Viradesthis was a goddess of the Tungri. Harimella was another provincial deity. Mr. Pennant found their names inscribed on altars at the Roman station at Burrens. German auxiliaries erected these altars. See Tour in Scotland, 1772, part ii. p. 406.
Ritter sees here a reference to the senate's servile flattery under Nero. The senate declared Poppaea's infant daughter a goddess, and later did the same for Poppaea herself. (See Ann. xv. 23, Dion. lxiii, Ann. xiv. 3.) This passage does not contradict Hist. iv. 61, where Tacitus says, "plerasque feminarum fatidicas et, augescente superstitione, arbitrantur deas;" i.e. they consider (arbitrantur) very many of their women to have prophetic powers. As their religious feeling grows, they consider (arbitrantur) these women goddesses, i.e. beings with a superhuman nature. They do not, however, make these women goddesses and worship them, as the Romans did Poppaea and her infant. The phrase facerent deas subtly implies this Roman practice. White.
9. Of the gods, Mercury is the principal object of their adoration; whom, on certain days, they think it lawful to propitiate even with human victims. To Hercules and Mars they offer the animals usually allotted for sacrifice. Some of the Suevi also perform sacred rites to Isis. What was the cause and origin of this foreign worship, I have not been able to discover; further than that her being represented with the symbol of a galley, seems to indicate an imported religion. They conceive it unworthy the grandeur of celestial beings to confine their deities within walls, or to represent them under a human similitude: woods and groves are their temples; and they affix names of divinity to that secret power, which they behold with the eye of adoration alone.
9. Of the gods, Mercury is the one they worship most. On certain days, they consider it lawful to appease him even with human sacrifices. To Hercules and Mars they offer the animals usually chosen for sacrifice. Some of the Suevi also perform sacred rites to Isis. I have not been able to discover the cause or origin of this foreign worship. The only clue is that Isis is represented by the symbol of a galley, suggesting an imported religion. They consider it unworthy of the gods’ greatness to confine them within walls or portray them in human form. Woods and groves are their temples. They give divine names to the hidden power they perceive only through worship.
Mercury, i.e. a god Tacitus names after the Roman Mercury because their attributes were similar. According to Paulus Diaconus (de Gestis Langobardorum, i. 9), this god was Wodun, or Gwodan, also called Odin. Mallet (North. Ant. ch. v.) says that Icelandic mythology calls him "the terrible and severe God, the Father of Slaughter, he who giveth victory and receiveth courage in the conflict, who nameth those that are to be slain." "The Germans drew their gods by their own character, who loved nothing so much themselves as to display their strength and power in battle, and to signalize their vengeance upon their enemies by slaughter and desolation." Some traces of Odin's worship remain today in almost all northern peoples' names for the fourth day of the week. That day was once dedicated to him. Its name means "Odin's day;" "Old Norse, Odinsdagr; Swedish and Danish, Onsdag; Anglo-Saxon, Wodenesdaeg, Wodnesdaeg; Dutch, Woensdag; English, Wednesday. As Odin or Wodun was supposed to correspond to the Mercury of the Greeks and Romans, the name of this day was expressed in Latin Dies Mercurii." (White).
"The appointed time for these sacrifices," says Mallet (North. Ant. ch. vi.), "was always determined by a superstitious opinion which made the northern nations regard the number 'three' as sacred and particularly dear to the gods. Thus, in every ninth month they renewed the bloody ceremony, which was to last nine days, and every day they offered up nine living victims, whether men or animals. But the most solemn sacrifices were those which were offered up at Upsal in Sweden every ninth year...." After explaining that attendance at this festival was compulsory, Mallet adds, "Then they chose among the captives in time of war, and among the slaves in time of peace, nine persons to be sacrificed. In whatever manner they immolated men, the priest always took care in consecrating the victim to pronounce certain words, as 'I devote thee to Odin,' 'I send thee to Odin.'" See Lucan i. 444. "Et quibus immitis placatur sanguine diro Teutates, horrensque feris altaribus Hesus." Teutates is Mercury, and Hesus is Mars. See also iii. 399, &c. "Lucus erat longo nunquam violatus ab aevo. ... Barbara ritu Sacra Deum, structae diris altaribus arae, Omnis et humanis lustrata cruoribus arbor."
As in the previous case, this means a deity with attributes matching those of the Roman Mars. The deity appears to have been not Thor, who corresponds more closely to the Roman Jupiter, but Tyr, "a warrior god, and the protector of champions and brave men!" "From Tyr is derived the name given to the third day of the week in most of the Teutonic languages, and which has been rendered into Latin by Dies Martis. Old Norse, Tirsdagr, Tisdagr; Swedish, Tisdag; Danish, Tirsdag; German, Dienstag; Dutch, Dingsdag; Anglo-Saxon, Tyrsdaeg, Tyvesdag, Tivesdaeg; English, Tuesday" (Mallet's North. Ant. ch. v.). White.
The Suevi appear to have been the Germanic tribes in question, and this worship the one mentioned at chap. xl. Signum in modum liburnae figuration corresponds to the vehiculum mentioned there. According to Ritter's view, the actual object was a pinnace mounted on wheels. We may also infer from ch. xl. that signum ipsum ("the very symbol") does not mean an image of the goddess. That chapter describes the goddess herself, si credere velis, as being washed in the sacred lake.
The Romans marked Saturn's arrival on their ancient coins with an image of a ship's stern. Many of these coins still survive. Similarly, other nations have often used images of galleys on their medals to mark the introduction of foreign religious rites.
Tacitus elsewhere mentions temples of German gods (e.g. 40, Templum Nerthae, Ann. i. 51, Templum Tanfanae). But the Romans called a consecrated grove, or any other sacred place, a templum.
10. No people are more addicted to divination by omens and lots. The latter is performed in the following simple manner. They cut a twig from a fruit-tree, and divide it into small pieces, which, distinguished by certain marks, are thrown promiscuously upon a white garment. Then, the priest of the canton, if the occasion be public; if private, the master of the family; after an invocation of the gods, with his eyes lifted up to heaven, thrice takes out each piece, and, as they come up, interprets their signification according to the marks fixed upon them. If the result prove unfavorable, there is no more consultation on the same affair that day; if propitious, a confirmation by omens is still required. In common with other nations, the Germans are acquainted with the practice of auguring from the notes and flight of birds; but it is peculiar to them to derive admonitions and presages from horses also. Certain of these animals, milk-white, and untouched by earthly labor, are pastured at the public expense in the sacred woods and groves. These, yoked to a consecrated chariot, are accompanied by the priest, and king, or chief person of the community, who attentively observe their manner of neighing and snorting; and no kind of augury is more credited, not only among the populace, but among the nobles and priests. For the latter consider themselves as the ministers of the gods, and the horses, as privy to the divine will. Another kind of divination, by which they explore the event of momentous wars, is to oblige a prisoner, taken by any means whatsoever from the nation with whom they are at variance, to fight with a picked man of their own, each with his own country's arms; and, according as the victory falls, they presage success to the one or to the other party.
10. No people are more devoted to divination through omens and the drawing of lots. They draw lots in the following simple way. They cut a twig from a fruit tree and divide it into small pieces. They mark the pieces with different symbols and scatter them randomly on a white cloth. For public matters, the district's priest conducts the ceremony. For private matters, the head of the household does so. After calling on the gods, he looks up to heaven and draws pieces three times. As each piece comes up, he interprets its meaning according to its marks. If the result is unfavorable, they make no further inquiry about the same matter that day. If favorable, they still require confirmation through omens. Like other nations, the Germans know how to read omens from birds' calls and flight. But only the Germans also seek warnings and predictions from horses. Certain horses, pure white and never used for ordinary work, graze in sacred woods and groves at public expense. These horses are harnessed to a sacred chariot. The priest and the community's king or chief accompany them, carefully observing their neighing and snorting. No form of divination is trusted more, not only among ordinary people but also among nobles and priests. For the priests consider themselves servants of the gods, but believe the horses know the gods' will. They use another kind of divination to predict the outcome of major wars. They take a prisoner, captured by any means from the nation they are in conflict with. They force him to fight a chosen man of their own, each using his own country's weapons. Depending on who wins, they predict success for one side or the other.
Herodotus mentions the Scythians using these divining rods, and Ammianus Marcellinus mentions the Alans using them. Saxo-Grammaticus (Hist. Dan. xiv, 288) illustrates the German method of divination in his account of Rugen’s inhabitants. Rugen is an island in the Baltic Sea: "Throwing, by way of lots, three pieces of wood, white in one part, and black in another, into their laps, they foretold good fortune by the coming up of the white; bad by that of the black."
The Persians followed the same practice, and the Germans appear to be descended from them. Darius was chosen as king through a horse’s neighing. Sacred white horses accompanied the army of Cyrus. When Xerxes retreated after his defeat, the sacred horses and consecrated chariot went ahead of him. Justin (i. 10) explains the reason for this superstition: "the Persians believed the Sun to be the only God, and horses to be peculiarly consecrated to him." The priest of the Isle of Rugen also read omens from a white horse, as described in Saxo-Grammaticus.
Montesquieu sees this custom as the origin of dueling and knight-errantry.
11. On affairs of smaller moment, the chiefs consult; on those of greater importance, the whole community; yet with this circumstance, that what is referred to the decision of the people, is first maturely discussed by the chiefs. They assemble, unless upon some sudden emergency, on stated days, either at the new or full moon, which they account the most auspicious season for beginning any enterprise. Nor do they, in their computation of time, reckon, like us, by the number of days, but of nights. In this way they arrange their business; in this way they fix their appointments; so that, with them, the night seems to lead the day. An inconvenience produced by their liberty is, that they do not all assemble at a stated time, as if it were in obedience to a command; but two or three days are lost in the delays of convening. When they all think fit, they sit down armed. Silence is proclaimed by the priests, who have on this occasion a coercive power. Then the king, or chief, and such others as are conspicuous for age, birth, military renown, or eloquence, are heard; and gain attention rather from their ability to persuade, than their authority to command. If a proposal displease, the assembly reject it by an inarticulate murmur; if it prove agreeable, they clash their javelins; for the most honorable expression of assent among them is the sound of arms.
11. The chiefs discuss minor matters, while the whole community considers those of greater importance. Yet the chiefs first discuss thoroughly whatever is put before the people for a decision. Unless a sudden emergency arises, they meet on fixed days, at either the new or full moon. They consider these the luckiest times to begin any undertaking. Unlike us, they measure time not by days but by nights. This is how they arrange their business and set their appointments, so that night seems to lead the day. One drawback of their freedom is that they do not all gather at the appointed time, as if obeying a command. Instead, two or three days are lost while everyone gathers. When they all think fit, they sit down armed. The priests call for silence and have the power to enforce it on these occasions. Then the king or chief speaks. Others distinguished by age, birth, military fame, or eloquence are also heard. These speakers gain attention more through their power to persuade than through their authority to command. If a proposal displeases the assembly, they reject it with an indistinct murmur. If they approve, they clash their javelins. For among them, the sound of weapons is the most honorable expression of agreement.
Montesquieu discusses this remarkable passage, so intriguing in political history, in his Spirit of Laws. vi 11. The celebrated author expresses surprise at such a balance between liberty and authority in the forests of Germany. He traces the origins of the English constitution to this balance. Tacitus again mentions the German form of government in his Annals, iv. 33.
The Book of Genesis shows how ancient this way of counting time is. "The evening and the morning were the first day." Caesar tells us that the Gauls "assert that, according to the tradition of their Druids, they are all sprung from Father Dis; on which account they reckon every period of time according to the number of nights, not of days; and observe birthdays and the beginnings of months and years in such a manner, that the day seems to follow the night." (Bell. Gall. vi. 18.) Traces of this way of counting remain in English, in the terms se'nnight and fort'night.
Ut turbae placuit. Doederlein reads this passage as describing how people took their seats haphazardly in the national assembly. They paid no attention to order, rank, age, and so on. But the passage more likely means that the people, not the chieftains, decided when the council’s business should begin. White.
And on an open plain. Vast piles of stone still mark the sites of these national councils. (See Mallet's Introduct. to Hist. of Denmark.) The English Stonehenge has been thought to be a relic of such councils. These assemblies were the origin of later gatherings under the Merovingian race of French kings, called the Fields of March. Under the Carlovingian kings, these gatherings were called the Fields of May. They later became the Plenary Courts of Christmas and Easter, and finally the States General.
Civilis's speech was greeted with this expression of applause. Tacitus, Hist. iv. 15.
12. Before this council, it is likewise allowed to exhibit accusations, and to prosecute capital offences. Punishments are varied according to the nature of the crime. Traitors and deserters are hung upon trees: cowards, dastards, and those guilty of unnatural practices, are suffocated in mud under a hurdle. This difference of punishment has in view the principle, that villainy should be exposed while it is punished, but turpitude concealed. The penalties annexed to slighter offences are also proportioned to the delinquency. The convicts are fined in horses and cattle: part of the mulct goes to the king or state; part to the injured person, or his relations. In the same assemblies chiefs are also elected, to administer justice through the cantons and districts. A hundred companions, chosen from the people, attended upon each of them, to assist them as well with their advice as their authority.
12. Accusations may also be brought before this council, and crimes punishable by death may be prosecuted there. Punishments vary according to the crime. Traitors and deserters are hanged from trees: cowards, the fainthearted, and those guilty of unnatural sexual acts, are suffocated in mud beneath a wicker frame. These different punishments follow a principle: wickedness should be exposed during punishment, but shameful acts should be hidden. Penalties for lesser offences are also proportionate to the wrongdoing. Those convicted are fined in horses and cattle: part of the fine goes to the king or state. The rest goes to the injured person or their relatives. The same assemblies also elect chiefs to administer justice throughout the cantons and districts. Each chief is accompanied by a hundred men chosen from the people, who support him with advice and authority.
Hung alive on gibbets. Severe penalties were threatened against anyone who took them down, alive or dead. The Salic law specifies these penalties.
In this passage, cowards and dastards probably refers to men who refused or failed to answer a call to war. Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 22) says men who refused to follow their chiefs to war were considered deserters and traitors. Later, the emperor Clothaire issued the following edict, preserved in the Lombard law: "Whatever freeman, summoned to the defence of his country by his Count, or his officers, shall neglect to go, and the enemy enter the country to lay it waste, or otherwise damage our liege subjects, he shall incur a capital punishment." Cowardice, treachery, and desertion were so hated and shameful among the Germans that the Salic law punished false accusations of these crimes.
These were so rare and shameful among the Germans that merely calling someone a name suggesting them was severely punished.
People who committed incest were buried alive in bogs in Scotland. Pennant's Tour in Scotland, 1772, part i. p. 351, and part ii. p. 421.
However, these lesser offenses included homicide, adultery, theft, and many other similar acts. This classification appears in the laws of the Germans and in a later passage by Tacitus himself.
These were then the country’s only riches, as already noted in this treatise. Later, gold and silver became plentiful, so all fines required by the Salic law were monetary. Money, however, still had a fixed value in cattle, as the Saxon law (Tit. xviii.) shows: "The Solidus is of two kinds; one contains two tremisses, that is, a beeve of twelve months, or a sheep with its lamb; the other, three tremisses, or a beeve of sixteen months. Homicide is compounded for by the lesser solidus; other crimes by the greater." The Saxons had their Weregeld, the Scots their Cro, Galnes, and Kelchin, and the Welsh their Gwerth, and Galanus. These were payments for injuries, and cattle were likewise the usual fine. See Pennant's Tour in Wales of 1773, pp. 273, 274.
Salic law often calls this fine "fred," meaning peace. This is because the fine was paid to the king or state as guardians of public peace.
A brief account of German civil government will be useful here. The Germans were divided into nations, some governed as kingdoms and others as republics. The kingdoms had kings, while the republics had chiefs. In both kingdoms and republics, generals directed military affairs. The nations were divided into cantons. Each canton had a chief, or count, who administered justice. The cantons were divided into districts called hundreds because each contained a hundred vills, or townships. Each hundred had a companion, or centenary, chosen from the people, who heard minor cases. The count could hear all cases, both major and minor. Tacitus calls the centenaries companions, following Roman custom. Among the Romans, the titles of honor were Caesar, the Legatus or Lieutenant of Caesar, and his comites, or companions. Courts met outdoors on high ground, in the shade of an oak, elm, or another large tree.
13. The Germans transact no business, public or private, without being armed: but it is not customary for any person to assume arms till the state has approved his ability to use them. Then, in the midst of the assembly, either one of the chiefs, or the father, or a relation, equips the youth with a shield and javelin. These are to them the manly gown; this is the first honor conferred on youth: before this they are considered as part of a household; afterwards, of the state. The dignity of chieftain is bestowed even on mere lads, whose descent is eminently illustrious, or whose fathers have performed signal services to the public; they are associated, however, with those of mature strength, who have already been declared capable of service; nor do they blush to be seen in the rank of companions. For the state of companionship itself has its several degrees, determined by the judgment of him whom they follow; and there is a great emulation among the companions, which shall possess the highest place in the favor of their chief; and among the chiefs, which shall excel in the number and valor of his companions. It is their dignity, their strength, to be always surrounded with a large body of select youth, an ornament in peace, a bulwark in war. And not in his own country alone, but among the neighboring states, the fame and glory of each chief consists in being distinguished for the number and bravery of his companions. Such chiefs are courted by embassies; distinguished by presents; and often by their reputation alone decide a war.
13. The Germans conduct no business, public or private, without being armed. But no one customarily takes up arms until the state has approved his ability to use them. Then, before the assembly, a chief, the young man's father, or another relative gives him a shield and javelin. These weapons are their gown of manhood. Receiving them is a young man's first honor. Before this ceremony, young men are considered members of a household. Afterwards, they are members of the state. Even mere boys receive the rank of chief if their ancestry is especially distinguished or their fathers have served the public outstandingly. However, these boys serve alongside men of mature strength who have already been declared fit for service. Nor are the boys ashamed to serve as companions. The companions themselves hold different ranks, assigned by the chief they follow. The companions compete fiercely for the highest place in their chief's favor. The chiefs compete to have the most companions and the bravest. Always having a large band of carefully chosen young men around them gives chiefs prestige and strength. These young men are an ornament in peace and a defense in war. A chief's fame and glory depend on the number and bravery of his companions. His reputation extends beyond his own country to neighboring states. Such chiefs are courted by ambassadors and honored with gifts. Often, their reputation alone decides the outcome of a war.
Even judges carried weapons while presiding in court. The Romans, by contrast, never carried weapons except when serving in the military.
These are the beginnings of the famous institution of chivalry. Kings' sons appear to have received arms from foreign princes. Thus, after Audoin defeated the Gepidae, the Lombards asked him to dine with his son Alboin, who shared his victory. Audoin refused, saying, "you know it is not customary with us for a king's son to dine with his father, until he has received arms from the king of another country." Warnefrid, De gestis Langobardorum, i. 23.
An allusion to the Roman toga virilis. German boys probably received their shields and spears at twelve or fifteen years old. This early introduction to warfare gave them the warlike character for which they were so famous. Thus, Seneca (Epist. 46) says, "A native of Germany brandishes, while yet a boy, his slender javelin." And again (in his book on Anger, i. 11), "Who are braver than the Germans?—who more impetuous in the charge?—who fonder of arms, in the use of which they are born and nourished, which are their only care?—who more inured to hardships, insomuch that for the most part they provide no covering for their bodies, no retreat against the perpetual severity of the climate?"
So it seems these young noblemen held the rank of principes, but their actual position was only among the comites. The German word Gesell applies specifically to these comrades in arms. They were so highly valued in Germany that killing or injuring them carried three times the fine for other freemen.
14. In the field of battle, it is disgraceful for the chief to be surpassed in valor; it is disgraceful for the companions not to equal their chief; but it is reproach and infamy during a whole succeeding life to retreat from the field surviving him. To aid, to protect him; to place their own gallant actions to the account of his glory, is their first and most sacred engagement. The chiefs fight for victory; the companions for their chief. If their native country be long sunk in peace and inaction, many of the young nobles repair to some other state then engaged in war. For, besides that repose is unwelcome to their race, and toils and perils afford them a better opportunity of distinguishing themselves; they are unable, without war and violence, to maintain a large train of followers. The companion requires from the liberality of his chief, the warlike steed, the bloody and conquering spear: and in place of pay, he expects to be supplied with a table, homely indeed, but plentiful. The funds for this munificence must be found in war and rapine; nor are they so easily persuaded to cultivate the earth, and await the produce of the seasons, as to challenge the foe, and expose themselves to wounds; nay, they even think it base and spiritless to earn by sweat what they might purchase with blood.
14. In battle, it is disgraceful for a chief to be outdone in courage. It is disgraceful for his companions not to match his courage. But leaving the battlefield alive after their chief has died brings shame and dishonor for the rest of their lives. Their first and most sacred duty is to help and protect him, and give him credit for their own bravery. Chiefs fight for victory. Companions fight for their chief. If their homeland remains at peace and idle for a long time, many young nobles seek another state at war. For their people dislike inactivity, and hardship and danger offer better chances to distinguish themselves. Besides, without war and violence, they cannot support a large following. A companion expects his chief to give him a warhorse and a bloodstained, victorious spear. Instead of pay, he expects simple but plentiful meals. The wealth needed for this generosity must come from war and plunder. These men are less easily persuaded to farm and wait for the harvest than to challenge enemies and risk wounds. Indeed, they think it shameful and cowardly to earn by sweat what they could buy with blood.
Thus, when the Romans captured Chonodomarus, king of the Alamanni, "his companions, two hundred in number, and three friends peculiarly attached to him, thinking it infamous to survive their prince, or not to die for him, surrendered themselves to be put in bonds." (Ammianus Marcellinus, xvi. 13.)
Montesquieu (Spirit of Laws, xxx, 3) rightly traces the origin of vassalage to this practice. At first, the prince gave his nobles weapons and supplies. As greed grew, money and then land were demanded. These lands, initially granted as benefices, eventually became hereditary possessions called fiefs. This led to the establishment of the feudal system.
15. During the intervals of war, they pass their time less in hunting than in a sluggish repose, divided between sleep and the table. All the bravest of the warriors, committing the care of the house, the family affairs, and the lands, to the women, old men, and weaker part of the domestics, stupefy themselves in inaction: so wonderful is the contrast presented by nature, that the same persons love indolence, and hate tranquillity! It is customary for the several states to present, by voluntary and individual contributions, cattle or grain to their chiefs; which are accepted as honorary gifts, while they serve as necessary supplies. They are peculiarly pleased with presents from neighboring nations, offered not only by individuals, but by the community at large; such as fine horses, heavy armor, rich housings, and gold chains. We have now taught them also to accept of money.
15. Between wars, they spend less time hunting than resting idly, dividing their time between sleep and feasting. All the bravest warriors leave the household, family affairs, and land to women, old men, and weaker household members. The warriors numb themselves with inactivity. Nature presents such an astonishing contrast: the same people love idleness and hate peace! Each state customarily gives its chiefs voluntary contributions from individuals, consisting of cattle or grain. The chiefs accept these as gifts of honor, though the gifts also provide necessary supplies. The chiefs are especially pleased with presents from neighboring nations, offered by both individuals and whole communities. These include fine horses, heavy armor, rich horse coverings, and gold chains. We have now taught them to accept money too.
Caesar says, less precisely, "The Germans pass their whole lives in hunting and military exercises." (Bell. Gall, vi. 21.) Tacitus’s account better fits the character of a barbarous people. Besides, hunting occupied only a few months each year. Those with no other occupation must therefore have spent most of the year idle. In this respect, and in others described later, North American savages match the ancient Germans exactly.
Yet this apparent contradiction fits perfectly with human nature. Among people guided more by impulse than reason, everything goes to extremes: war and peace, movement and rest, love and hatred. Nothing is pursued in moderation.
These are early forms of tribute, though the contributions described here were voluntary and not forced. The origins of state treasuries are noted above, where "part of the mulct" is said to be "paid to the king or state." The Romans taught the Germans taxation by taxing them.
So, in later times, when tribute was customary, the Saxons had to provide 500 oxen or cows annually. The French kings Clothaire I. and Pepin required this tribute. (See Eccard, tom. i. pp. 84, 480.) Honey, grain, and other agricultural products were also received as tribute. (Ibid. p. 392.)
For war expenses and other state needs, especially public entertainment. So, besides the Steora, or annual tribute, the French kings received the Osterstuopha, or Easter cup. This payment was made before the public assembly of the Field of March.
This was a dangerous lesson, and it eventually proved disastrous for the Roman empire. Herodian says of the Germans of his time, "They are chiefly to be prevailed upon by bribes; being fond of money, and continually selling peace to the Romans for gold." (Lib. vi. 139.)
16. It is well known that none of the German nations inhabit cities; or even admit of contiguous settlements. They dwell scattered and separate, as a spring, a meadow, or a grove may chance to invite them. Their villages are laid out, not like ours in rows of adjoining buildings; but every one surrounds his house with a vacant space, either by way of security against fire, or through ignorance of the art of building. For, indeed, they are unacquainted with the use of mortar and tiles; and for every purpose employ rude unshapen timber, fashioned with no regard to pleasing the eye. They bestow more than ordinary pains in coating certain parts of their buildings with a kind of earth, so pure and shining that it gives the appearance of painting. They also dig subterraneous caves, and cover them over with a great quantity of dung. These they use as winter-retreats, and granaries; for they preserve a moderate temperature; and upon an invasion, when the open country is plundered, these recesses remain unviolated, either because the enemy is ignorant of them, or because he will not trouble himself with the search.
16. It is well known that none of the German nations live in cities. They do not even allow settlements with houses touching one another. They live scattered and apart, wherever a spring, meadow, or grove may attract them. Their villages are not laid out like ours, in rows of adjoining buildings. Instead, everyone leaves an open space around his house, either to guard against fire, or from ignorance of building techniques. Indeed, they do not know how to use mortar or tiles. For every purpose, they use rough, unshaped timber, with no concern for its appearance. They take unusual care to coat certain parts of their buildings with a kind of earth. This earth is so pure and bright that the coating looks like paint. They also dig underground chambers, and cover them with large amounts of dung. They use these chambers as winter shelters and grain stores, because the chambers maintain a moderate temperature. During an invasion, when the open country is plundered, these hiding places remain untouched. Either the enemy does not know about them, or he will not bother to search for them.
This custom lasted a long time. For Ammianus Marcellinus, who wrote about the Roman wars in Germany, does not mention a single city. The place names in Ptolemy (ii. 11) therefore refer not to cities but to scattered villages. The Germans did not even have what we would call towns, although Caesar claims otherwise.
The land around the house, enclosed by hedges, was the famous Salic land. It passed down through the male line, excluding the female line.
The danger of fire was especially serious during war. For, as Caesar tells us, these people knew how to sling red-hot clay balls onto thatched roofs. They also threw burning javelins onto the roofs. (Bell. Gall. v. 42.)
Similarly, Mela (ii. 1) writes about the Sarmatians: "On account of the length and severity of their winters, they dwell under ground, either in natural or artificial caverns." When Germany was devastated by a forty years' war, Kircher saw many local people taking refuge in high mountain caves. They brought their flocks, herds, and other possessions with them. For many other interesting details about these and other underground caves, see his Mundus Subterraneus, viii. 3, p. 100. In Hungary, grain is still commonly stored in underground chambers today.
Near Newbottle, the home of the Marquis of Lothian, are some underground rooms and passages cut into solid rock. These probably served as winter shelters and grain stores, like those dug by the ancient Germans. Pennant's Tour in 1769, 4to, p.63.
17. The clothing common to all is a sagum fastened by a clasp, or, in want of that, a thorn. With no other covering, they pass whole days on the hearth, before the fire. The more wealthy are distinguished by a vest, not flowing loose, like those of the Sarmatians and Parthians, but girt close, and exhibiting the shape of every limb. They also wear the skins of beasts, which the people near the borders are less curious in selecting or preparing than the more remote inhabitants, who cannot by commerce procure other clothing. These make choice of particular skins, which they variegate with spots, and strips of the furs of marine animals, the produce of the exterior ocean, and seas to us unknown. The dress of the women does not differ from that of the men; except that they more frequently wear linen, which they stain with purple; and do not lengthen their upper garment into sleeves, but leave exposed the whole arm, and part of the breast.
17. All wear a sagum , a cloak fastened with a clasp or, if none is available, a thorn. With no other covering, they spend whole days by the fire on the hearth. The wealthier people stand out by wearing a tunic. Unlike the loose garments of the Sarmatians and Parthians, their tunics fit tightly and show the shape of every limb. They also wear animal skins. People near the borders take less care in choosing or preparing these than those living farther away. The latter cannot obtain other clothing through trade. These more remote inhabitants choose particular skins and decorate them with spots and strips of fur from marine animals. These animals come from the outer ocean and seas unknown to us. Women dress like men, except that they more often wear linen, which they dye purple. Their outer garments have no sleeves, leaving the whole arm and part of the breast exposed.
This was a square cloak, also called rheno. Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 21) writes: "They use skins for clothing, or the short rhenones, and leave the greatest part of the body naked." Isidore (xix. 23) describes the rhenones as "garments covering the shoulders and breast, as low as the navel, so rough and shaggy that they are impenetrable to rain." Mela (iii. 3), writing about the Germans, says, "The men are clothed only with the sagum, or the bark of trees, even in the depth of winter."
All savages like a variety of colors, so the Germans decorated their furs with patches of other animals’ skins. The animals mentioned here were probably types of seals. This practice continues today with ermine fur, which is decorated with patches of black lambskin.
The Northern Sea and Frozen Ocean.
Pliny confirms the same point. He adds that "the women beyond the Rhine are not acquainted with any more elegant kind of clothing." (xix. 1.)
Not the rich, costly purple worn by Roman nobles, but some ordinary material, such as vaccinium. Pliny says the Gauls used vaccinium as a purple dye for slaves’ clothes (xvi. 18.)
18. The matrimonial bond is, nevertheless, strict and severe among them; nor is there anything in their manners more commendable than this. Almost singly among the barbarians, they content themselves with one wife; a very few of them excepted, who, not through incontinence, but because their alliance is solicited on account of their rank, practise polygamy. The wife does not bring a dowry to her husband, but receives one from him. The parents and relations assemble, and pass their approbation on the presents—presents not adapted to please a female taste, or decorate the bride; but oxen, a caparisoned steed, a shield, spear, and sword. By virtue of these, the wife is espoused; and she in her turn makes a present of some arms to her husband. This they consider as the firmest bond of union; these, the sacred mysteries, the conjugal deities. That the woman may not think herself excused from exertions of fortitude, or exempt from the casualties of war, she is admonished by the very ceremonial of her marriage, that she comes to her husband as a partner in toils and dangers; to suffer and to dare equally with him, in peace and in war: this is indicated by the yoked oxen, the harnessed steed, the offered arms. Thus she is to live; thus to die. She receives what she is to return inviolate and honored to her children; what her daughters-in-law are to receive, and again transmit to her grandchildren.
18. Nevertheless, the marriage bond among them is strict and demanding. Nothing in their customs deserves greater praise. Almost alone among barbarians, they are content with one wife. Only a very few have several wives. This is not because of lust, but because their rank makes others seek marriage alliances with them. The wife does not bring her husband a dowry, but receives one from him. Parents and relatives gather and approve the gifts. These gifts are not meant to please a woman's taste or adorn the bride. Instead, they are oxen, a horse fitted for riding, a shield, a spear, and a sword. These gifts seal the marriage, and the wife in turn gives her husband some weapons. They regard these gifts as the strongest bond of marriage, its sacred mysteries, and its guardian gods. The marriage ceremony itself warns the woman not to think herself excused from acts of courage or the risks of war. She joins her husband as a partner in hardship and danger. She must suffer and face danger equally with him, in peace and war. The yoked oxen, the harnessed horse, and the weapons offered all express this duty. This is how she must live, and how she must die. She receives what she must pass on intact and honored to her children. Her daughters-in-law must receive the same and pass it on again to her grandchildren.
All their ancient legal codes confirm the Germans’ chastity and strict observance of marriage laws. Their sexual morality sharply contrasted with the Romans’ sexual excesses during the empire’s decline. Salvian highlights this contrast in his treatise De Gubernatione Dei, lib. vii.
Thus Caesar (Bell. Gall. i. 53) tells us that Ariovistus had two wives. Others had more. Having multiple wives proved harder to abolish because it was seen as a sign of wealth and an aristocratic privilege.
The Germans bought their wives, as the following marriage provisions in Saxon law show: "A person who espouses a wife shall pay to her parents 300 solidi (about 180l. sterling); but if the marriage be without the consent of the parents, the damsel, however, consenting, he shall pay 600 solidi. If neither the parents nor damsel consent, that is, if she be carried off by violence, he shall pay 300 solidi to the parents, and 340 to the damsel, and restore her to her parents."
Thus, Saxon law says about dowries: "The Ostfalii and Angrarii determine, that if a woman have male issue, she is to possess the dower she received in marriage during her life, and transmit it to her sons."
19. They live, therefore, fenced around with chastity; corrupted by no seductive spectacles, no convivial incitements. Men and women are alike unacquainted with clandestine correspondence. Adultery is extremely rare among so numerous a people. Its punishment is instant, and at the pleasure of the husband. He cuts off the hair of the offender, strips her, and in presence of her relations expels her from his house, and pursues her with stripes through the whole village. Nor is any indulgence shown to a prostitute. Neither beauty, youth, nor riches can procure her a husband: for none there looks on vice with a smile, or calls mutual seduction the way of the world. Still more exemplary is the practice of those states in which none but virgins marry, and the expectations and wishes of a wife are at once brought to a period. Thus, they take one husband as one body and one life; that no thought, no desire, may extend beyond him; and he may be loved not only as their husband, but as their marriage. To limit the increase of children, or put to death any of the later progeny is accounted infamous: and good habits have there more influence than good laws elsewhere.
19. They therefore live protected by chastity. No seductive spectacles or temptations at feasts corrupt them. Men and women alike know nothing of secret correspondence. Adultery is extremely rare among so large a population. Punishment is immediate and left to the husband’s discretion. He cuts off the offending wife’s hair, strips her, and drives her from his house before her relatives. He then whips her through the whole village. Nor is any leniency shown to a prostitute. Neither beauty, youth, nor wealth can win her a husband. For no one there smiles at vice or calls mutual seduction the way of the world. Still more admirable is the practice of those states where only virgins marry. A wife’s hopes and wishes for marriage are fulfilled once and for all. Thus, women take one husband, just as they have one body and one life. This is so that no thought or desire may reach beyond him. He is to be loved not only as their husband, but as their marriage itself. To limit the number of children, or kill any children born later, is considered shameful. Good habits have more influence there than good laws have elsewhere.
Ergo septae pudicitiâ agunt. Some editions have septâ pudicitiâ. That reading, however, would suggest that their chastity resulted more from their husbands’ care and watchfulness. Tacitus, by contrast, seems to want to show that their chastity came from innate virtue. That meaning is better expressed by septae pudicitiâ, the reading in the Arundelian MS.
Seneca writes with great force and passion on this subject: "Nothing is so destructive to morals as loitering at public entertainments; for vice more easily insinuates itself into the heart when softened by pleasure. What shall I say! I return from them more covetous ambitious, and luxurious." (Epist. vii.)
The Germans valued their hair greatly and considered having it cut off a serious disgrace. So cutting off hair was used as punishment for certain crimes. If an innocent person’s hair was cut off, the act was resented as a wrong.
A letter from St. Boniface, archbishop of Mentz, to Ethelbald, king of England, describes Saxon punishments for violating chastity. Women themselves inflicted these punishments: "In ancient Saxony (now Westphalia), if a virgin pollute her father's house, or a married woman prove false to her vows, sometimes she is forced to put an end to her own life by the halter, and over the ashes of her burned body her seducer is hanged: sometimes a troop of females assembling lead her through the circumjacent villages, lacerating her body, stripped to the girdle, with rods and knives; and thus, bloody and full of minute wounds, she is continually met by new tormenters, who in their zeal for chastity do not quit her till she is dead, or scarcely alive, in order to inspire a dread of such offences." See Michael Alford's Annales Ecclesiae Anglo-Saxon., and Eccard.
A passage in Valerius Maximus suggests that the Cimbrian states probably belonged to this group: "The wives of the Teutones besought Marius, after his victory, that he would deliver them as a present to the Vestal virgins; affirming that they should henceforth, equally with themselves, abstain from the embraces of the other sex. This request not being granted, they all strangled themselves the ensuing night." (Lib. vi. 1.3.)
Among the Heruli, a wife was expected to hang herself immediately at her husband's grave to avoid lifelong disgrace.
This expression may refer to both the murder of young children and the deliberate ending of a pregnancy. German laws severely punished both crimes.
Quemquam ex agnatis. In Roman law, agnati generally meant relatives on the father's side. Here, the term means children born after an heir to the father's name and property already existed.
Justin makes a similar point about the Scythians: "Justice is cultivated by the dispositions of the people, not by the laws." (ii. 2.) The good laws Tacitus mentions did little to prevent atrocities among the Romans. The frequent complaints of the senators show how ineffective these laws were, especially this complaint from Minucius Felix: "I behold you, exposing your babes to the wild beasts and birds, or strangling the unhappy wretches with your own hands. Some of you, by means of drugs, extinguish the newly-formed man within your bowels, and thus commit parricide on your offspring before you bring them into the world." (Octavius, c. 30.) This practice had become so common at Rome that even the virtuous Pliny defends it, arguing that "the great fertility of some women may require such a licence." (xxix. 4, 37.)
20. In every house the children grow up, thinly and meanly clad, to that bulk of body and limb which we behold with wonder. Every mother suckles her own children, and does not deliver them into the hands of servants and nurses. No indulgence distinguishes the young master from the slave. They lie together amidst the same cattle, upon the same ground, till age separates, and valor marks out, the free-born. The youths partake late of the pleasures of love, and hence pass the age of puberty unexhausted: nor are the virgins hurried into marriage; the same maturity, the same full growth is required: the sexes unite equally matched and robust; and the children inherit the vigor of their parents. Children are regarded with equal affection by their maternal uncles as by their fathers: some even consider this as the more sacred bond of consanguinity, and prefer it in the requisition of hostages, as if it held the mind by a firmer tie, and the family by a more extensive obligation. A person's own children, however, are his heirs and successors; and no wills are made. If there be no children, the next in order of inheritance are brothers, paternal and maternal uncles. The more numerous are a man's relations and kinsmen, the more comfortable is his old age; nor is it here any advantage to be childless.
20. In every household, children grow up in thin, shabby clothing, developing the huge bodies and limbs we marvel at. Every mother nurses her own children rather than handing them over to servants and nurses. The young master receives no more pampering than the slave. Both lie among the same cattle, on the same ground, until age separates them and courage distinguishes the freeborn. Young men begin enjoying sexual pleasures late, and so reach the end of puberty with their strength undiminished. Nor are young women rushed into marriage. They must reach the same maturity and full growth. The sexes come together equally matched and strong, and their children inherit their parents' vigor. Maternal uncles love their sisters' children as much as fathers love their own. Some even regard the bond with a maternal uncle as the more sacred blood tie. They prefer that bond when demanding hostages, as if it bound people's hearts more firmly and placed obligations on more relatives. A person's own children, however, are his heirs and successors, and no wills are made. If there are no children, brothers come next in line to inherit, followed by paternal and maternal uncles. The more relatives and kinsmen a man has, the more comfortable his old age. Being childless brings no advantage here.
Nudi ac sordidi does not mean "in nakedness and filth," as most translators have assumed. Personal filth is incompatible with the daily bathing mentioned in c. 22. And nudus does not necessarily mean complete nakedness (see note 4, p. 293).
At first, this age appears to have been twelve, when a youth became subject to legal penalties. Thus the Salic law states, "If a child under twelve commit a fault, 'fred,' or a mulct, shall not be required of him." Later, the age was fifteen. Thus the Ripuary law states, "A child under fifteen shall not be responsible." Again, "If a man die, or be killed, and leave a son; before he have completed his fifteenth year, he shall neither prosecute a cause, nor be called upon to answer in a suit: but at this term, he must either answer himself, or choose an advocate. In like manner with regard to the female sex." The Burgundian law makes the same provision. Fifteen was therefore the age of legal adulthood. In later times, when heavier armor was used, legal adulthood was delayed still further.
A passage in Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 21) illustrates this: "They who are the latest in proving their virility are most commended. By this delay they imagine the stature is increased, the strength improved, and the nerves fortified. To have knowledge of the other sex before twenty years of age, is accounted in the highest degree scandalous."
Equal not only in age and physical constitution, but also in social status. Many German legal codes impose penalties on both men and women who marry people of lower rank.
This explains the many examples of concern for sisters and their children in the history of the Merovingian kings of France. It also explains the many wars fought on their behalf.
In Rome, the Haeredipetae, or legacy-hunters, flattered rich people who had no children. Roman writers often condemned and mocked this practice.
21. It is an indispensable duty to adopt the enmities of a father or relation, as well as their friendships: these, however, are not irreconcilable or perpetual. Even homicide is atoned by a certain fine in cattle and sheep; and the whole family accepts the satisfaction, to the advantage of the public weal, since quarrels are most dangerous in a free state. No people are more addicted to social entertainments, or more liberal in the exercise of hospitality. To refuse any person whatever admittance under their roof, is accounted flagitious. Every one according to his ability feasts his guest: when his provisions are exhausted, he who was late the host, is now the guide and companion to another hospitable board. They enter the next house uninvited, and are received with equal cordiality. No one makes a distinction with respect to the rights of hospitality, between a stranger and an acquaintance. The departing guest is presented with whatever he may ask for; and with the same freedom a boon is desired in return. They are pleased with presents; but think no obligation incurred either when they give or receive.
21. Taking on the feuds of a father or relative, as well as their friendships, is an essential duty. But these feuds can be settled and do not last forever. Even killing someone can be atoned for by paying a set fine in cattle and sheep. The whole family accepts this compensation, which benefits the public good, since quarrels are most dangerous in a free state. No people are more devoted to social gatherings or more generous in their hospitality. Refusing anyone shelter under their roof is considered shameful. Everyone provides a feast for a guest according to their means. When the food runs out, the former host guides and accompanies the guest to another welcoming table. The two enter the next house uninvited and receive an equally warm welcome. No one distinguishes between strangers and acquaintances when offering hospitality. A departing guest is given whatever they ask for. With the same freedom, the host asks for a gift in return. They enjoy presents, but feel no obligation when giving or receiving them.
Avengers of blood are mentioned in the law of Moses, Numb. xxxv. 19. Roman law also addresses "those who on account of unworthiness are deprived of their inheritance." Under this heading, the law states that "such heirs as are proved to have neglected revenging the testator's death, shall be obliged to restore the entire profits."
Among this fierce, warlike people, allowing payment in place of revenge was a wise measure. To ensure an offender’s poverty did not defeat this purpose, his whole family shared responsibility for paying compensation.
All uncivilized nations share this trait. The trait becomes less necessary as a nation develops the skills of civilized life.
Convictibus et hospitiis. "Festivities and entertainments." The first word refers to friends and fellow-countrymen. The second refers to people from other tribes and foreigners. Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 23) says, "They think it unlawful to offer violence to their guests, who, on whatever occasion they come to them, are protected from injury, and considered as sacred. Every house is open to them, and provision everywhere set before them." Mela (iii. 3) says of the Germans, "They make right consist in force, so that they are not ashamed of robbery: they are only kind to their guests, and merciful to suppliants. The Burgundian law lays a fine of three solidi on every man who refuses his roof or hearth to the coming guest." The Salic law, however, rightly forbids hospitality to those guilty of terrible crimes. It penalizes anyone who shelters someone who has dug up or robbed the dead before that offender compensates the relatives.
22. [Their manner of living with their guest is easy and affable] As soon as they arise from sleep, which they generally protract till late in the day, they bathe, usually in warm water, as cold weather chiefly prevails there. After bathing they take their meal, each on a distinct seat, and a a separate table. Then they proceed, armed, to business, and not less frequently to convivial parties, in which it is no disgrace to pass days and nights, without intermission, in drinking. The frequent quarrels that arise amongst them, when intoxicated, seldom terminate in abusive language, but more frequently in blood. In their feasts, they generally deliberate on the reconcilement of enemies, on family alliances, on the appointment of chiefs, and finally on peace and war; conceiving that at no time the soul is more opened to sincerity, or warmed to heroism. These people, naturally void of artifice or disguise, disclose the most secret emotions of their hearts in the freedom of festivity. The minds of all being thus displayed without reserve, the subjects of their deliberation are again canvassed the next day; and each time has its advantages. They consult when unable to dissemble; they determine when not liable to mistake.
22. [They are relaxed and friendly with their guests] They generally sleep until late in the day and bathe as soon as they get up. They usually bathe in warm water, because the weather there is mostly cold. After bathing, they eat, each with a separate seat and table. Then they go armed to attend to business, and just as often to drinking parties. They see no disgrace in drinking for days and nights without a break. Frequent drunken quarrels seldom end with insults alone, but more often lead to bloodshed. At their feasts, they generally discuss settling feuds, forming family alliances, appointing chiefs, and finally, peace and war. They believe that at no other time are people more open and honest, or more inspired to heroic deeds. These people are naturally free of deceit or pretense. In the freedom of celebration, they reveal their hearts’ deepest feelings. Once everyone has spoken without reserve, they discuss the same matters again the next day. Each occasion has its advantages. They discuss matters when they cannot hide their thoughts. They make decisions when they are not likely to make mistakes.
The clause in brackets is probably misplaced because it does not fit well with what comes before or after.
Today, Russians stand out most among northern peoples for their use of warm baths. Some North American tribes also have hypocausts, or stoves.
Eating at separate tables generally signals a tendency to eat excessively. Traces of this practice may be found in Homer and other writers who described ancient customs. The same practice has also been observed among the people of Otaheite, who occasionally eat enormous quantities of food.
The following provision in the Salic law shows how common these bloody quarrels were. It also shows lawmakers’ praiseworthy efforts to curb them: "If at a feast where there are four or five men in company, one of them be killed, the rest shall either convict one as the offender, or shall jointly pay the composition for his death. And this law shall extend to seven persons present at an entertainment."
Herodotus, i. p. 66, reports that the same custom was practiced among the Persians.
23. Their drink is a liquor prepared from barley or wheat brought by fermentation to a certain resemblance of wine. Those who border on the Rhine also purchase wine. Their food is simple; wild fruits, fresh venison, or coagulated milk. They satisfy hunger without seeking the elegances and delicacies of the table. Their thirst for liquor is not quenched with equal moderation. If their propensity to drunkenness be gratified to the extent of their wishes, intemperance proves as effectual in subduing them as the force of arms.
23. Their drink is made from barley or wheat fermented until it somewhat resembles wine. Those who live near the Rhine also buy wine. Their food is simple: wild fruits, fresh game, or curdled milk. They satisfy their hunger without seeking fine dining or delicacies. But they do not show the same moderation in satisfying their thirst for alcohol. If allowed to drink as much as they wish, drunkenness can subdue them as effectively as armed force.
Pliny describes this drink, beer or ale, in the following passage: "The western nations have their intoxicating liquor, made of steeped grain. The Egyptians also invented drinks of the same kind. Thus drunkenness is a stranger in no part of the world; for these liquors are taken pure, and not diluted as wine is. Yet, surely, the Earth thought she was producing corn. Oh, the wonderful sagacity of our vices! we have discovered how to render even water intoxicating." (xiv. 22.)
Mela says, "Their manner of living is so rude and savage, that they eat even raw flesh; either fresh killed, or softened by working with their hands and feet, after it has grown stiff in the hides of tame or wild animals." (iii. 3.) Florus reports that eating bread and cooked meat and drinking wine softened the Cimbri’s ferocity. This happened in the mildest part of Italy. (iii. 3.)
This should not be taken to mean cheese, although Caesar says of the Germans, "Their diet chiefly consists of milk, cheese and flesh." (Bell. Gall. vi. 22.) Pliny knew German customs thoroughly. He says more accurately, "It is surprising that the barbarous nations who live on milk should for so many ages have been ignorant of, or have rejected, the preparation of cheese; especially since they thicken their milk into a pleasant tart substance, and a fat butter: this is the scum of milk, of a thicker consistence than what is called the whey. It must not be omitted that it has the properties of oil, and is used as an unguent by all the barbarians, and by us for children." (xi. 41.)
Europeans have used this policy against the Indigenous peoples of North America. The policy has almost completely wiped out some tribes.
24. They have only one kind of public spectacle, which is exhibited in every company. Young men, who make it their diversion, dance naked amidst drawn swords and presented spears. Practice has conferred skill at this exercise; and skill has given grace; but they do not exhibit for hire or gain: the only reward of this pastime, though a hazardous one, is the pleasure of the spectators. What is extraordinary, they play at dice, when sober, as a serious business: and that with such a desperate venture of gain or loss, that, when everything else is gone, they set their liberties and persons on the last throw. The loser goes into voluntary servitude; and, though the youngest and strongest, patiently suffers himself to be bound and sold. Such is their obstinacy in a bad practice—they themselves call it honor. The slaves thus acquired are exchanged away in commerce, that the winner may get rid of the scandal of his victory.
24. They have only one kind of public entertainment, performed at every gathering. Young men dance naked among drawn swords and leveled spears for their own amusement. Practice has made them skillful, and skill has made them graceful. But they do not perform for pay or profit. Though dangerous, this pastime brings no reward beyond the spectators’ enjoyment. Strangely, they take dice seriously and play while sober. They risk so much on winning or losing that, when everything else is gone, they stake their freedom and themselves on the final throw. The loser willingly becomes a slave. Even if he is the youngest and strongest, he patiently allows himself to be bound and sold. Such is their stubborn commitment to a bad practice. They themselves call it honor. Slaves acquired this way are traded away so that the winner may escape the disgrace of his victory.
St. Ambrose offers a striking account of this passion for gambling among a barbarous people: "It is said that the Huns, who continually make war upon other nations, are themselves subject to usurers, with whom they run in debt at play; and that, while they live without laws, they obey the laws of the dice alone; playing when drawn up in line of battle; carrying dice along with their arms, and perishing more by each others' hands than by the enemy. In the midst of victory they submit to become captives, and suffer plunder from their own countrymen, which they know not how to bear from the foe. On this account they never lay aside the business of war, because, when they have lost all their booty by the dice, they have no means of acquiring fresh supplies for play, but by the sword. They are frequently borne away with such a desperate ardor, that, when the loser has given up his arms, the only part of his property which he greatly values, he sets the power over his life at a single cast to the winner or usurer. It is a fact, that a person, known to the Roman emperor, paid the price of a servitude which he had by this means brought upon himself, by suffering death at the command of his master."
25. The rest of their slaves have not, like ours, particular employments in the family allotted them. Each is the master of a habitation and household of his own. The lord requires from him a certain quantity of grain, cattle, or cloth, as from a tenant; and so far only the subjection of the slave extends. His domestic offices are performed by his own wife and children. It is usual to scourge a slave, or punish him with chains or hard labor. They are sometimes killed by their masters; not through severity of chastisement, but in the heat of passion, like an enemy; with this difference, that it is done with impunity. Freedmen are little superior to slaves; seldom filling any important office in the family; never in the state, except in those tribes which are under regal government. There, they rise above the free-born, and even the nobles: in the rest, the subordinate condition of the freedmen is a proof of freedom.
25. Their other slaves, unlike ours, are not assigned specific duties within the household. Each slave runs a home and household of his own. The master demands a fixed amount of grain, cattle, or cloth from him, as from a tenant. The slave's obligations go no further. His own wife and children perform his household duties. It is usual to whip a slave or punish him with chains or hard labor. Masters sometimes kill their slaves, not as a harsh punishment, but in a fit of anger, as with an enemy. The difference is that masters face no punishment for killing slaves. Freed slaves rank only slightly above slaves. They seldom hold any important household position and never hold public office, except in tribes ruled by kings. In those tribes, freed slaves rise above the freeborn and even the nobles. In the other tribes, the lower status of freed slaves is proof of freedom.
These slaves had the same status as the vassals, or serfs, of a few centuries ago. Such serfs made up most of the population in every European country. Later, following the Roman example, the Germans had slaves of lower status. The term slave came to apply only to this lower group, while rural serfs were called lidi.
Killing a personal enemy carried a fine, so no one could do so without punishment. But a man could kill his own slave without punishment. If he killed someone else’s slave, however, he had to pay the owner the slave’s price.
Freedmen gained astonishing power and arrogance by serving the emperor’s vices. This was a striking feature of the reigns of some of the worst Roman emperors.
26. Lending money upon interest, and increasing it by usury, is unknown amongst them: and this ignorance more effectually prevents the practice than a prohibition would do. The lands are occupied by townships, in allotments proportional to the number of cultivators; and are afterwards parcelled out among the individuals of the district, in shares according to the rank and condition of each person. The wide extent of plain facilitates this partition. The arable lands are annually changed, and a part left fallow; nor do they attempt to make the most of the fertility and plenty of the soil, by their own industry in planting orchards, inclosing meadows, and watering gardens. Corn is the only product required from the earth: hence their year is not divided into so many seasons as ours; for, while they know and distinguish by name Winter, Spring, and Summer, they are unacquainted equally with the appellation and bounty of Autumn.
26. Lending money at interest and increasing it through usury, are unknown among them. This ignorance prevents the practice more effectively than a ban would. Townships occupy the land, in allotments based on the number of farmers. The land is then divided among individuals in the district, with shares based on each person’s rank and standing. The vast plains make this division easy. The fields under cultivation change each year, and some land is left fallow. Nor do they try to make full use of the soil’s fertility and abundance through their own work. They do not plant orchards, fence off meadows, or water gardens. Grain is the only crop they ask of the earth. Their year therefore has fewer seasons than ours. They recognize Winter, Spring, and Summer and have names for them. But they know neither the name nor the bounty of Autumn.
In Rome, by contrast, usury was what our author calls "an ancient evil, and a perpetual source of sedition and discord." Annals, vi. 16.
All copies read per vices, "by turns," or alternately. But the context seems clearly to require the simple change to per vicos. Many scholars have approved this change, so it is adopted in this translation.
Caesar gives several details about this aspect of German government. "They are not studious of agriculture, the greater part of their diet consisting of milk, cheese, and flesh; nor has any one a determinate portion of land, his own peculiar property; but the magistrates and chiefs allot every year to tribes and clanships forming communities, as much land, and in such situations, as they think proper, and oblige them to remove the succeeding year. For this practice they assign several reasons: as, lest they should be led, by being accustomed to one spot, to exchange the toils of war for the business of agriculture; lest they should acquire a passion for possessing extensive domains, and the more powerful should be tempted to dispossess the weaker; lest they should construct buildings with more art than was necessary to protect them from the inclemencies of the weather; lest the love of money should arise amongst them, the source of faction and dissensions; and in order that the people, beholding their own possessions equal to those of the most powerful, might be retained by the bonds of equity and moderation." Bell. Gall. vi. 21.
The Germans did not plant fruit trees, so they knew nothing of the fruits autumn brings. They now have all the autumn fruits their climate supports. Yet their language still preserves a reminder of what they once lacked. Their only word for this season refers to gathering grain: Herbst, Harvest.
27. Their funerals are without parade. The only circumstance to which they attend, is to burn the bodies of eminent persons with some particular kinds of wood. Neither vestments nor perfumes are heaped upon the pile: the arms of the deceased, and sometimes his horse, are given to the flames. The tomb is a mound of turf. They contemn the elaborate and costly honours of monumental structures, as mere burthens to the dead. They soon dismiss tears and lamentations; slowly, sorrow and regret. They think it the women's part to bewail their friends, the men's to remember them.
27. Their funerals are simple. Their only concern is to burn the bodies of prominent people with certain kinds of wood. Neither clothing nor perfumes are piled onto the funeral pyre: the dead man's weapons, and sometimes his horse, are burned with him. The grave is a mound of turf. They scorn elaborate and costly monuments as nothing more than burdens on the dead. Their tears and cries of grief soon end, but their sorrow and regret fade slowly. They consider it women's role to mourn their friends, and men's to remember them.
In this respect, as in many others, German customs directly contrasted with Roman customs. Pliny mentions a private citizen, C. Caecilius Claudius Isidorus, who ordered about 10,000l. sterling spent on his funeral. Elsewhere, Pliny says, "Intelligent persons asserted that Arabia did not produce such a quantity of spices in a year as Nero burned at the obsequies of his Poppaea." (xxxiii. 10, and xii. 18.)
These lines by Lucan describe the final honors Cornelia paid to the body of Pompey the Great. They aptly illustrate the customs mentioned here: Collegit vestes, miserique insignia Magni. Armaque, et impressas auro, quas gesserat olim Exuvias, pictasque togas, velamina summo Ter conspecta Jovi, funestoque intulit igni. Lib. ix. 175. "There shone his arms, with antique gold inlaid, There the rich robes which she herself had made, Robes to imperial Jove in triumph thrice display'd: The relics of his past victorious days, Now this his latest trophy serve to raise, And in one common flame together blaze." ROWE.
Thus, Childeric, king of the Franks, was buried with his spear and sword, which were found in his tomb. His horse's head was also found, along with a horseshoe, gold buckles, and horse coverings. A human skull was also discovered, perhaps belonging to his groom.
28. This is the sum of what I have been able to learn concerning the origin and manners of the Germans in general. I now proceed to mention those particulars in which they differ from each other; and likewise to relate what nations have migrated from Germany into Gaul. That great writer, the deified Julius, asserts that the Gauls were formerly the superior people; whence it is probable that some Gallic colonies passed over into Germany: for how small an obstacle would a river be to prevent any nation, as it increased in strength, from occupying or changing settlements as yet lying in common, and unappropriated by the power of monarchies! Accordingly, the tract betwixt the Hercynian forest and the rivers Rhine and Mayne was possessed by the Helvetii: and that beyond, by the Boii; both Gallic tribes. The name of Boiemum still remains, a memorial of the ancient settlement, though its inhabitants are now changed. But whether the Aravisci migrated into Pannonia from the Osi, a German nation; or the Osi into Germany from the Aravisci; the language, institutions, and manners of both being still the same, is a matter of uncertainty; for, in their pristine state of equal indigence and equal liberty, the same advantages and disadvantages were common to both sides of the river. The Treveri and Nervii are ambitious of being thought of German origin; as if the reputation of this descent would distinguish them from the Gauls, whom they resemble in person and effeminacy. The Vangiones, Triboci, and Nemetes, who inhabit the bank of the Rhine, are without doubt German tribes. Nor do the Ubii, although they have been thought worthy of being made a Roman colony, and are pleased in bearing the name of Agrippinenses from their founder, blush to acknowledge their origin from Germany; from whence they formerly migrated, and for their approved fidelity were settled on the bank of the Rhine, not that they might be guarded themselves, but that they might serve as a guard against invaders.
28. This sums up what I have learned about the origins and customs of the Germans as a whole. I now turn to the ways these peoples differ from one another. I will also describe the nations that have migrated from Germany into Gaul. That great writer, the deified Julius, states that the Gauls were once the stronger people. It is therefore likely that some Gallic colonies crossed into Germany. For how little could a river hinder a nation growing in strength from occupying land or moving to new settlements? Such lands were still open to all, with no kingdoms claiming them. Thus, the Helvetii occupied the land between the Hercynian forest and the rivers Rhine and Mayne. The Boii occupied the land beyond. Both were Gallic tribes. The name Boiemum still survives as a reminder of the ancient settlement, though its inhabitants have now changed. But it is uncertain whether the Aravisci migrated into Pannonia from the Osi, a German nation. The Osi may instead have migrated into Germany from the Aravisci. Both peoples still share the same language, institutions, and customs. For in their earliest days, both were equally poor and equally free. The same advantages and disadvantages existed on both sides of the river. The Treveri and Nervii are eager to be thought of as German in origin. They seem to think this ancestry would set them apart from the Gauls, whom they resemble in appearance and effeminacy. The Vangiones, Triboci, and Nemetes, who live along the Rhine, are undoubtedly German tribes. Nor are the Ubii, ashamed to acknowledge their German origins, although they have been judged worthy of becoming a Roman colony. They also take pleasure in the name Agrippinenses, derived from their founder. They migrated from Germany in earlier times. Because they had proved their loyalty, they were settled along the Rhine. The purpose was not to protect the Ubii themselves, but to have them guard against invaders.
Caesar's account is as follows: "There was once a time when the Gauls surpassed the Germans in bravery and waged war against them. Because their population was large and land was scarce, the Gauls sent colonies beyond the Rhine. The most fertile parts of Germany bordered the Hercynian forest. (I note that Eratosthenes and other Greeks knew of this forest by report and called it Orcinia.) The Volcae and Tectosages therefore settled in these fertile areas. These peoples still occupy the same settlements and have a strong reputation for both administering justice and military courage. They now live in the same poverty and contentment as the Germans, whose way of life they have adopted." Bell. Gall. vi. 24.
The inhabitants of Switzerland, which then extended farther towards Lyons than it does today.
A people of Gaul who bordered on the Helvetii, according to Strabo and Caesar. After Caesar conquered them, the Aedui gave them a settlement in the region now called the Bourbonnois. The name of their German colony, Boiemum, still survives in Bohemia. When the Helvetii and Boii entered Germany is unknown. However, it seems probable that they entered during the reign of Tarquinius Priscus. For Livy tells us that, at that time, Ambigatus, king of the Bituriges (people of Berry), sent out colonists. Ambigatus sent his sister's son Sigovesus with these colonists into the Hercynian forest to relieve his overpopulated kingdom. (Livy, v. 33; et seq.)
During Augustus's reign, the Marcomanni drove the Boii from Boiemum. The Boii retreated to Noricum, which was named Boioaria after them and is now Bavaria.
These people lived in the part of Lower Hungary now called the Palatinate of Pilis.
Near the end of this treatise, Tacitus himself seems to settle this question. He notes that the Osi spoke the Pannonian language and accepted paying tribute, proving they were not a German nation. The Osi lived beyond the Marcomanni and Quadi, occupying the northern part of Transdanubian Hungary. Their territory perhaps extended to Silesia, where a place called Ossen, in the duchy of Oels, is known for its salt and glass works. The scholar Pelloutier, however, argues that the Osi were Germans, though his view is less likely.
The people living in the modern diocese of Treves.
Those from Cambresis and Hainault.
Those in the dioceses of Worms, Strasburg, and Spires.
Those in the diocese of Cologne. The Ubii migrated from Germany to Gaul because of the Catti’s hostility and their own support for Rome. Marcus Agrippa took the Ubii under his protection in the year of Rome 717. (Strabo, iv. p. 194.) Agrippina, the wife of Claudius and mother of Nero, was born among the Ubii. She arranged for a colony to be established there, named after her.
29. Of all these people, the most famed for valor are the Batavi; whose territories comprise but a small part of the banks of the Rhine, but consist chiefly of an island within it. These were formerly a tribe of the Catti, who, on account of an intestine division, removed to their present settlements, in order to become a part of the Roman empire. They still retain this honor, together with a memorial of their ancient alliance; for they are neither insulted by taxes, nor oppressed by farmers of the revenue. Exempt from fiscal burthens and extraordinary contributions, and kept apart for military use alone, they are reserved, like a magazine of arms, for the purposes of war. The nation of the Mattiaci is under a degree of subjection of the same kind: for the greatness of the Roman people has carried a reverence for the empire beyond the Rhine and the ancient limits. The Mattiaci, therefore, though occupying a settlement and borders on the opposite side of the river, from sentiment and attachment act with us; resembling the Batavi in every respect, except that they are animated with a more vigorous spirit by the soil and air of their own country. I do not reckon among the people of Germany those who occupy the Decumate lands, although inhabiting between the Rhine and Danube. Some of the most fickle of the Gauls, rendered daring through indigence, seized upon this district of uncertain property. Afterwards, our boundary line being advanced, and a chain of fortified posts established, it became a skirt of the empire, and part of the Roman province.
29. Of all these peoples, the Batavi are the most famous for courage. Their territory includes only a small stretch of the Rhine’s banks, but lies mainly on an island in the river. They were once a tribe of the Catti. But an internal conflict led them to move to their present lands to become part of the Roman empire. They still retain this honored position, along with a reminder of their ancient alliance. For they are neither humiliated by taxes nor oppressed by tax collectors. They are exempt from taxes and special levies, and set apart for military service alone. Like a storehouse of weapons, they are held in reserve for war. The nation of the Mattiaci is subject to Rome on similar terms. For the greatness of the Roman people has spread respect for the empire beyond the Rhine and its ancient boundaries. The Mattiaci therefore occupy lands and border territory on the opposite side of the river. Yet their sympathies and loyalty lead them to act with us. They resemble the Batavi in every respect, except that their native soil and climate give them a more vigorous spirit. I do not count the inhabitants of the Decumate lands among the peoples of Germany, although they live between the Rhine and Danube. Some of the most restless Gauls, made bold by poverty, seized this district, whose ownership was uncertain. Later, we advanced our boundary and established a chain of fortified posts. The district then became an outlying strip of the empire and part of the Roman province.
Now called the Betuwe, part of the provinces of Holland and Guelderland.
This is why an ancient inscription calls the Batavi "the brothers and friends of the Roman people."
This nation lived in parts of the regions now called the Weteraw, Hesse, Isenburg and Fulda. The territory included Mattium, now Marpurg, and the Fontes Mattiaci, now Wisbaden, near Mentz.
The various peoples of Germany had their own borderlands, called marks or marches. They defended these by keeping them deserted and uncultivated. Thus Caesar, Bell. Gall. iv 3: "They think it the greatest honor to a nation, to have as wide an extent of vacant land around their dominions as possible; by which it is indicated, that a great number of neighboring communities are unable to withstand them. On this account, the Suevi are said to have, on one side, a tract of 600 (some learned men think we should read 60) miles desert for their boundaries." Elsewhere, Caesar gives another reason for this policy: they believe these empty borderlands protect them from sudden raids. (Bell. Gall. vi. 13.)
Batavia is low-lying and damp, while the country of the Mattiaci is high and dry. This contrast sufficiently supports the remark for anyone who gives climate any influence.
Now Swabia. Near the end of Augustus’s reign, the Marcommanni left their settlements near the Rhine and migrated to Bohemia. Some Gauls without settled homes among the Rauraci and Sequani occupied the lands the Marcommanni left vacant. These lands seem to have been called Decumates (Decimated) because the inhabitants paid a tenth of their produce for Roman protection. The inhabitants were vulnerable to German raids. Adrian defended them with a rampart extending from Neustadt to the Neckar near Wimpfen, a distance of sixty French leagues. Neustadt is a town on the Danube near the mouth of the river Altmühl.
About Upper Germany.
30. Beyond these dwell the Catti, whose settlements, beginning from the Hercynian forest, are in a tract of country less open and marshy than those which overspread the other states of Germany; for it consists of a continued range of hills, which gradually become more scattered; and the Hercynian forest both accompanies and leaves behind, its Catti. This nation is distinguished by hardier frames, compactness of limb, fierceness of countenance, and superior vigor of mind. For Germans, they have a considerable share of understanding and sagacity; they choose able persons to command, and obey them when chosen; keep their ranks; seize opportunities; restrain impetuous motions; distribute properly the business of the day; intrench themselves against the night; account fortune dubious, and valor only certain; and, what is extremely rare, and only a consequence of discipline, depend more upon the general than the army. Their force consists entirely in infantry; who, besides their arms, are obliged to carry tools and provisions. Other nations appear to go to a battle; the Catti, to war. Excursions and casual encounters are rare amongst them. It is, indeed, peculiar to cavalry soon to obtain, and soon to yield, the victory. Speed borders upon timidity; slow movements are more akin to steady valor.
30. Beyond these peoples live the Catti, whose settlements begin at the Hercynian forest. Their country is less open and marshy than the lands occupied by the other states of Germany. Instead, it consists of a continuous range of hills that gradually become more scattered. The Hercynian forest runs alongside its Catti and then leaves them behind. This nation stands out for its hardier bodies, compact limbs, fierce faces, and greater mental vigor. For Germans, they show considerable understanding and good judgment. They choose capable commanders and obey them once chosen. They hold their ranks, seize opportunities, and restrain rash impulses. They organize the day's tasks properly and dig defenses for the night. They regard luck as uncertain and courage alone as reliable. And, something extremely rare and possible only through discipline, they rely more on their general than on their army. Their force consists entirely of infantry, who must carry tools and supplies as well as their weapons. Other nations seem to go into battle, but the Catti go to war. Raids and chance encounters are rare among them. Cavalry, by contrast, characteristically wins victory quickly and gives it up just as quickly. Speed borders on fearfulness, while slow movements are closer to steady courage.
The Catti held a large territory between the Rhine, Mayne and Sala, and the Hartz forest, on this side of the Weser. This area now includes Hesse, Thuringia, and parts of Paderborn, Fulda, and Franconia. Scholars have often noted that Caesar, Florus and Ptolemy’s accounts of the Suevi should be understood as referring to the Catti. Leibnitz suggests that the Catti were named after the active animal whose name resembles theirs. The German word for cat is Catte, or Hessen.
Pliny, who knew Germany well, gives a striking description of the Hercynian forest: "The vast trees of the Hercynian forest, untouched for ages, and as old as the world, by their almost immortal destiny exceed common wonders. Not to mention circumstances which would not be credited, it is certain that hills are raised by the repercussion of their meeting roots; and where the earth does not follow them, arches are formed as high as the branches, which, struggling, as it were, with each other, are bent into the form of open gates, so wide, that troops of horse may ride under them." xvi. 2.
Duriora corpora. "Hardier frames," meaning hardier than those of the other Germans. In Hist. ii 32. the Germans in general are said to have fluxa corpora. By contrast, in c. 4 of this treatise, the Germans are described as tantùm ad impetum valida.
Floras, ii. 18, expresses this thought well: "Tanti exercitus, quanti imperator." "An army is worth so much as its general is."
31. A custom followed among the other German nations only by a few individuals, of more daring spirit than the rest, is adopted by general consent among the Catti. From the time they arrive at years of maturity they let their hair and beard grow; and do not divest themselves of this votive badge, the promise of valor, till they have slain an enemy. Over blood and spoils they unveil the countenance, and proclaim that they have at length paid the debt of existence, and have proved themselves worthy of their country and parents. The cowardly and effeminate continue in their squalid disguise. The bravest among them wear also an iron ring (a mark of ignominy in that nation) as a kind of chain, till they have released themselves by the slaughter of a foe. Many of the Catti assume this distinction, and grow hoary under the mark, conspicuous both to foes and friends. By these, in every engagement, the attack is begun: they compose the front line, presenting a new spectacle of terror. Even in peace they do not relax the sternness of their aspect. They have no house, land, or domestic cares: they are maintained by whomsoever they visit: lavish of another's property, regardless of their own; till the debility of age renders them unequal to such a rigid course of military virtue.
31. Among other German nations, only a few men, bolder than the rest, follow a custom accepted by all the Catti. Once they reach adulthood, they let their hair and beard grow. They keep this sign of their vow, a pledge of courage, until they have killed an enemy. Over the blood and spoils, they uncover their faces. They declare that they have finally repaid the debt of life and proved worthy of their country and parents. The cowardly and unmanly keep their unkempt appearance. The bravest also wear an iron ring as a kind of chain until they free themselves by killing an enemy. Among their people, such a ring is a mark of shame. Many of the Catti take on this distinction and grow gray still wearing it, standing out to enemies and friends alike. These men begin the attack in every battle. They form the front line, presenting a fresh sight of terror. Even in peace, they keep their stern appearance. They have no house, land, or household responsibilities. Whoever they visit supports them. They spend other people's property freely and pay no attention to their own. They live this way until the weakness of old age leaves them unable to sustain such a harsh military discipline.
Similarly, our author (Hist. iv. 61) says Civilis let his hair and beard grow because of a private vow. Paul Warnefrid's "History of the Lombards," iii. 7, gives another example. It relates that "six thousand Saxons who survived the war, vowed that they would never cut their hair, nor shave their beards, till they had been revenged of their enemies, the Suevi." Strada (Bell. Belg. vii. p. 344) mentions a later example of this custom. He describes William Lume, one of the Counts of Mark, "who bound himself by a vow not to cut his hair till he had revenged the deaths of Egmont and Horn."
The iron ring seems to have been a mark of slavery. This custom was revived later, but for courtship rather than military purposes. Thus, in 1414, John duke of Bourbon made a vow to win his mistress’s favor. Sixteen knights and gentlemen joined him in the vow. He and the knights would wear gold rings around their left legs, while the gentlemen would wear silver ones. They would wear the rings every Sunday for two years, until they met an equal number of knights and gentlemen willing to compete against them in a tournament. (Vertot, Mém. de l'Acad. des Inscr. tom. ii. p. 596.)
About 150 years later, the Catti united with the remaining Cherusci on this side of the Weser. Their allies also included the Attuarii, Sicambri, Chamavi, Bructeri, and Chauci. Together, these peoples joined the Francic league, defeated the Romans, and seized Gaul. The French derive their name, customs, and laws from the Catti.
32. Next to the Catti, on the banks of the Rhine, where, now settled in its channel, it is become a sufficient boundary, dwell the Usipii and Tencteri. The latter people, in addition to the usual military reputation, are famed for the discipline of their cavalry; nor is the infantry of the Catti in higher estimation than the horse of the Tencteri. Their ancestors established it, and are imitated by posterity. Horsemanship is the sport of their children, the point of emulation of their youth, and the exercise in which they persevere to old age. Horses are bequeathed along with the domestics, the household gods, and the rights of inheritance: they do not, however, like other things, go to the eldest son, but to the bravest and most warlike.
32. Next to the Catti live the Usipii and Tencteri, on the banks of the Rhine. Here the river has settled into its channel and forms an adequate boundary. The Tencteri have the usual reputation for military skill, but are also famous for their disciplined cavalry. The infantry of the Catti is no more highly regarded than the cavalry of the Tencteri. Their ancestors established this cavalry tradition, and later generations follow their example. Their children ride for sport, their young people compete in horsemanship, and they keep riding into old age. Horses are passed down along with household servants, household gods, and inheritance rights. But unlike other possessions, horses do not go to the eldest son, but to the bravest and most warlike.
These two tribes shared a history of wars and misfortunes. They had previously been driven from their settlements on the Rhine, a little below Mentz. According to Caesar (Bell. Gall. iv. 1, et seq.), they then occupied the territories of the Menapii on both sides of the Rhine. After further misfortunes, the two tribes gained the lands of the Sicambri. During the reign of Augustus, Tiberius had moved the Sicambri to this side of the Rhine. These lands covered the present counties of Berg, Mark, Lippe, and Waldeck, and the bishopric of Paderborn.
33. Contiguous to the Tencteri were formerly the Bructeri; but report now says that the Chamavi and Angrivarii, migrating into their country, have expelled and entirely extirpated them, with the concurrence of the neighboring nations, induced either by hatred of their arrogance, love of plunder, or the favor of the gods towards the Romans. For they even gratified us with the spectacle of a battle, in which above sixty thousand Germans were slain, not by Roman arms, but, what was still grander, by mutual hostilities, as it were for our pleasure and entertainment. May the nations retain and perpetuate, if not an affection for us, at least an animosity against each other! since, while the fate of the empire is thus urgent, fortune can bestow no higher benefit upon us, than the discord of our enemies.
33. The Bructeri formerly lived next to the Tencteri. But reports now say that the Chamavi and Angrivarii have moved into Bructeri territory, driving them out and completely destroying them. The neighboring nations joined in, either from hatred of the Bructeri’s arrogance, a desire for plunder, or the gods’ favor toward the Romans. For these nations even pleased us with the spectacle of a battle in which more than sixty thousand Germans died. They fell not to Roman weapons but, more gloriously still, in fighting among themselves, as if for our pleasure and entertainment. May these nations keep alive forever, if not affection for us, at least hatred for one another! For while the empire’s fate is so pressing, fortune can give us no greater gift than discord among our enemies.
Their settlements lay between the rivers Rhine, Lippe (Luppia), and Ems (Amisia), and the province of Friesland. This area is now Westphalia and Over-Issel. Alting (Notit. German. Infer, p. 20) suggests their name came from Broeken, or Bruchen, meaning marshes, because marshes were common there.
Before this migration, the Chamavi lived along the Ems, where Lingen and Osnaburg now stand. The Angrivarii lived along the Weser (Visurgis), where Minden and Schawenburg now stand. Tacitus briefly mentions an earlier migration of the Chamavi to the Rhine’s banks in Annal. xiii. 55. The Angrivarii were later called Angrarii and became part of the Saxon nation.
They were not completely wiped out. Some survived and even formed a prominent part of the Francic league, as noted earlier. Claudian also mentions them in his panegyric on the fourth consulate of Honorius, v. 450. Venit accola sylvae Bructerus Hercyniae. "The Bructerian, borderer on the Hercynian forest, came." According to Eccard, after their expulsion, they settled between Cologne and Hesse.
The Bructeri were ruled by kings and fought many wars against the Romans. This explains their arrogance and power. Before their countrymen destroyed them, Vestricius Spurinna frightened the Bructeri into submission without a battle. For this, he was awarded a triumphal statue. Pliny the younger mentions this fact, book ii. epist. 7.
A reference to gladiatorial shows. The slaughter happened near the canal of Drusus, where the Roman guard on the Rhine could watch the battle. News of the battle reached Rome in the first year of Trajan’s reign.
This treatise was written during Trajan’s reign, when Roman affairs seemed unusually prosperous. For this reason, some critics have suggested that Tacitus wrote vigentibus, "flourishing," instead of urgentibus, "urgent." But other passages make clear that Tacitus recognized the forces slowly but surely destroying the Roman empire. He saw these forces even when appearances seemed most reassuring. The usual reading is therefore probably correct. Aikin.
34. Contiguous to the Angrivarii and Chamavi backwards lie the Dulgibini, Chasauri, and other nations less known. In front, the Frisii succeed; who are distinguished by the appellations of Greater and Lesser, from their proportional power. The settlements of both stretch along the border of the Rhine to the ocean; and include, besides, vast lakes, which have been navigated by Roman fleets. We have even explored the ocean itself on that side; and fame reports that columns of Hercules are still remaining on that coast; whether it be that Hercules was ever there in reality, or that whatever great and magnificent is anywhere met with is, by common consent, ascribed to his renowned name. The attempt of Drusus Germanicus to make discoveries in these parts was sufficiently daring; but the ocean opposed any further inquiry into itself and Hercules. After a while no one renewed the attempt; and it was thought more pious and reverential to believe the actions of the gods, than to investigate them.
34. Behind the Angrivarii and Chamavi, and bordering them, lie the Dulgibini, Chasauri, and other less-known nations. In front lie the Frisii, called Greater and Lesser according to their relative power. Both groups have settlements stretching along the Rhine’s border to the ocean. Their lands also include vast lakes, which Roman fleets have sailed. We have even explored the ocean itself on that side. Reports say that columns of Hercules still stand on that coast. Perhaps Hercules really went there. Or perhaps people everywhere agree to credit his famous name with anything great and magnificent they find. Drusus Germanicus made a bold enough attempt to explore these regions. But the ocean prevented any further investigation of its waters and Hercules. After a while, no one tried again. People thought believing in the deeds of the gods showed greater piety and reverence than investigating them.
These people first lived near the source of the Lippe. They then moved to the settlements of the Chamavi and Angrivarii, who had driven out the Bructeri. They appear to have been the same people whom Velleius Paterculus, ii. 105, calls the Attuarii. Under that name, they joined the Francic league. Strabo calls them Chattuarii.
Namely, the Ansibarii and Tubantes. Alting thought the Ansibarii or Amsibarii took their name from living near the river Ems (Amisia). He thought the Tubantes were called Tho Benten, or the wandering troops, because they frequently moved. He also thought they lived in what is now Drente in Over-Issel. Furstenburg (Monum. Paderborn.) includes the Ambrones among these peoples. The Ambrones lived along the river Ambrus, now Emmeren.
The Frieslanders. The lesser Frisii lived on this side of the Flevum (Zuyderzee), and the greater Frisii on the other.
In Roman times, this country was covered by vast lakes, made even larger by frequent flooding from the sea. As late as 1530, one such flood overwhelmed seventy-two villages. An even more terrible flood in 1569 submerged much of the sea-coast of Holland and almost all Friesland. In Friesland alone, 20,000 people drowned.
Wherever land seemed to end and further travel appeared impossible, seafaring nations have invented stories of pillars of Hercules. The pillars celebrated by the Frisians must have been at the far end of Friesland. They cannot have been in Sweden and the Cimmerian promontory, as Rudbeck supposes.
Drusus, the brother of Tiberius and father of Germanicus, imposed a tribute on the Frisians. This is mentioned in the Annals, iv. 72. He also performed other outstanding services in Germany and was himself given the title Germanicus.
35. Hitherto we have traced the western side of Germany. It turns from thence with a vast sweep to the north: and first occurs the country of the Chauci, which, though it begins immediately from Frisia, and occupies part of the seashore, yet stretches so far as to border on all the nations before mentioned, till it winds round so as to meet the territories of the Catti. This immense tract is not only possessed, but filled by the Chauci; a people the noblest of the Germans, who choose to maintain their greatness by justice rather than violence. Without ambition, without ungoverned desires, quiet and retired, they provoke no wars, they are guilty of no rapine or plunder; and it is a principal proof of their power and bravery, that the superiority they possess has not been acquired by unjust means. Yet all have arms in readiness; and, if necessary, an army is soon raised: for they abound in men and horses, and maintain their military reputation even in inaction.
35. So far we have traced the western side of Germany. From there, Germany curves north in a vast sweep. First comes the country of the Chauci, which begins just beyond Frisia and includes part of the coast. Yet their country reaches far enough to border all the peoples already mentioned, curving around to meet the Catti’s territories. The Chauci not only possess this vast region but fill it. They are the noblest of the Germans, choosing to maintain their greatness through justice rather than violence. Free from ambition and uncontrolled desires, they live quietly and keep to themselves. They provoke no wars and commit no raids or plunder. A chief sign of their power and courage is that their superior position was not gained through injustice. Yet all keep weapons ready. If necessary, they can quickly raise an army, because they have abundant men and horses. Even when they are not fighting, they maintain their military reputation.
The Chauci stretched along the seacoast from the Ems to the Elbe (Albis). They bordered all the nations mentioned above, extending between those nations and the Cherusci as far as the Catti. The Chauci were divided into Greater and Lesser. According to Ptolemy, the Greater inhabited the country between the Weser and the Elbe. The Lesser inhabited the country between the Weser and Ems. But Tacitus (Annals xi. 19) seems to reverse this order. Alting supposes the name Chauci came from Kauken, meaning people distinguished by courage and loyalty. This meaning agrees with Tacitus's description of them. Others derive the name from Kauk, an owl, referring to the owl's hostility toward cats (Catti). Others derive it from Kaiten, jackdaws, which are very numerous on their coast. Pliny gives an excellent description of the coastal Chauci's country and way of life. His account concerns people who live without any trees or fruit-bearing plants: "In the North are the nations of Chauci, who are divided into Greater and Lesser. Here, the ocean, having a prodigious flux and reflux twice in the space of every day and night, rolls over an immense tract, leaving it a matter of perpetual doubt whether it is part of the land or sea. In this spot, the wretched natives, occupying either the tops of hills, or artificial mounds of turf, raised out of reach of the highest tides, build their small cottages; which appear like sailing vessels when the water covers the circumjacent ground, and like wrecks when it has retired. Here from their huts they pursue the fish, continually flying from them with the waves. They do not, like their neighbors, possess cattle, and feed on milk; nor have they a warfare to maintain against wild beasts, for every fruit of the earth is far removed from them. With flags and seaweed they twist cordage for their fishing-nets. For fuel they use a kind of mud, taken up by hand, and dried, rather in the wind than the sun: with this earth they heat their food, and warm their bodies, stiffened by the rigorous north. Their only drink is rain-water collected in ditches at the thresholds of their doors. Yet this miserable people, if conquered to-day by the Roman arms, would call themselves slaves. Thus it is that fortune spares many to their own punishment." Hist. Nat. xvi. 1.
For this reason, the Romans established fortified posts to hold back the Chauci. Lucan calls them Cayci in the following passage: Et vos crinigeros bellis arcere Caycos Oppositi. (Phars. i. 463.) "You, too, tow'rds Rome advance, ye warlike band, That wont the shaggy Cauci to withstand." (ROWE)
36. Bordering on the Chauci and Catti are the Cherusci; who, for want of an enemy, long cherished a too lasting and enfeebling peace: a state more flattering than secure; since the repose enjoyed amidst ambitious and powerful neighbors is treacherous; and when an appeal is made to the sword, moderation and probity are names appropriated by the victors. Thus, the Cherusci, who formerly bore the titles of just and upright, are now charged with cowardice and folly; and the good fortune of the Catti, who subdued them, has grown into wisdom. The ruin of the Cherusci involved that of the Fosi, a neighboring tribe, equal partakers of their adversity, although they had enjoyed an inferior share of their prosperity.
36. The Cherusci border on the Chauci and Catti. With no enemy to face, the Cherusci long cherished a peace that lasted too long and weakened them. This peace was more comforting than secure, because peace among ambitious and powerful neighbors is deceptive. And when disputes are settled by the sword, the victors claim moderation and honesty for themselves. Thus the Cherusci, once called just and upright, are now accused of cowardice and folly. Meanwhile, the good fortune of the Catti, who conquered them, has come to be seen as wisdom. The downfall of the Cherusci also brought down the Fosi, a neighboring tribe. The Fosi shared equally in their suffering, although they had enjoyed a smaller share of their prosperity.
The Cherusci then lived between the Weser and the Elbe. This region now includes Luneburg, Brunswick, and part of the Marche of Brandenburg on this side of the Elbe. During the reign of Augustus, their territory was larger, extending even to this side of the Weser. This is indicated by the accounts of Drusus’s expedition given by Dio and Velleius Paterculus. However, as Dithmar observes, references to the Cherusci on this side of the Weser may concern their dependents, the Dulgibini. For according to Strabo, Varus was destroyed by the Cherusci and the peoples subject to them. Tacitus recounts the brave deeds of Arminius, the celebrated Cherusci chief, in the 1st and 2d books of his Annals.
Cluver and several others suppose the Fosi were the same people as the ancient Saxons. But since the Fosi bordered on the Cherusci, Leibnitz’s view is closer to the truth. He believed the Fosi lived along the river Fusa, which joins the Aller (Allera) at Cellae. They were loosely attached to the Cherusci, as Hildesheim now is to Brunswick. The name Saxons came after Tacitus and was not known until the reign of Antoninus Pius. At that time, the Saxons poured out of the Cimbric Chersonesus. Later, together with the Angles, they seized Britain.
37. In the same quarter of Germany, adjacent to the ocean, dwell the Cimbri; a small state at present, but great in renown. Of their past grandeur extensive vestiges still remain, in encampments and lines on either shore, from the compass of which the strength and numbers of the nation may still be computed, and credit derived to the account of so prodigious an army. It was in the 640th year of Rome that the arms of the Cimbri were first heard of, under the consulate of Caecilius Metellus and Papirius Carbo; from which era to the second consulate of the emperor Trajan is a period of nearly 210 years. So long has Germany withstood the arms of Rome. During this long interval many mutual wounds have been inflicted. Not the Samnite, the Carthaginian, Spain, Gaul, or Parthia, have given more frequent alarms; for the liberty of the Germans is more vigorous than the monarchy of the Arsacidae. What has the East, which has itself lost Pacorus, and suffered an overthrow from Ventidius, to boast against us, but the slaughter of Crassus? But the Germans, by the defeat or capture of Carbo, Cassius, Scaurus Aurelius, Servilius Caepio, and Cneius Manlius, deprived the Roman people of five consular armies; and afterwards took from Augustus himself Varus with three legions. Nor did Caius Marius in Italy, the deified Julius in Gaul, or Drusus, Nero, or Germanicus in their own country, defeat then without loss. The subsequent mighty threats of Caligula terminated in ridicule. Then succeeded tranquillity; till, seizing the occasion of our discords and civil wars, they forced the winter-quarters of the legions, and even aimed at the possession of Gaul; and, again expelled thence, they have in latter times been rather triumphed over than vanquished.
37. In the same part of Germany, beside the ocean, live the Cimbri. They are now a small state, but their fame is great. Extensive traces of their former greatness remain in camps and defensive lines on either shore. The size of these remains still allows us to estimate the nation's strength and numbers. It also lends credibility to accounts of so enormous an army. Rome first heard of the Cimbri's military power in its 640th year, when Caecilius Metellus and Papirius Carbo were consuls. From then to the emperor Trajan's second consulship is nearly 210 years. For so long has Germany resisted Rome's armies. During this long period, both sides have inflicted many wounds. Neither the Samnites, the Carthaginians, Spain, Gaul, nor Parthia have caused more frequent alarm. For German freedom has greater strength than the monarchy of the Arsacidae. What can the East boast of against us except the slaughter of Crassus? The East itself lost Pacorus and suffered defeat at the hands of Ventidius. But the Germans defeated or captured Carbo, Cassius, Scaurus Aurelius, Servilius Caepio, and Cneius Manlius. In doing so, they deprived the Roman people of five consular armies. Later, they robbed Augustus himself of Varus and three legions. Nor did Caius Marius in Italy or the deified Julius in Gaul defeat the Germans without losses. Neither did Drusus, Nero, or Germanicus in the Germans' own country. Caligula's mighty threats that followed ended in ridicule. Then came peace, until the Germans took advantage of our internal conflicts and civil wars. They stormed the legions' winter quarters and even sought control of Gaul. The Germans were driven out of Gaul again. But in recent times, they have been celebrated in Roman triumphs rather than actually defeated.
The name of this people still survives. The land they inhabited is called the Cimbric Chersonesus, or Peninsula, and includes Jutland, Sleswig, and Holstein. Mallet briefly but accurately describes the fame and changing fortunes of the Cimbri in the "Introduction" to the "History of Denmark."
Though migration, floods, and wars had greatly reduced their numbers at this time, they later recovered. From this reservoir of peoples came the Franks, Saxons, Normans, and various other tribes. These tribes brought all Europe under Germanic rule.
Their fame spread through Germany, Gaul, Spain, Britain, Italy, and as far as the Sea of Azoph (Palus Maeotis). According to Posidonius, they reached that sea and named the Cimmerian or Cimbrian Bosphorus after themselves.
This is usually, and probably rightly, understood to refer to both shores of the Cimbric Chersonesus. Cluver and Dithmar, however, believe these encampments were either in Italy, on the river Athesis (Adige), or in Narbonnensian Gaul near Aquae Sextiae (Aix in Provence). Florus (iii. 3) mentions that the Teutoni defeated by Marius took up a position there in a valley containing a river. Plutarch gives an account of the enormous numbers of Cimbri who made this terrible invasion. He reports 300,000 fighting men, with a much greater number of women and children. (Plut. Marius, p. 411.)
Nerva was consul for the fourth time and Trajan for the second, in the 85lst year of Rome. Tacitus wrote this treatise that year.
The Parthians defeated P. Decidius Saxa, lieutenant of Syria. Pacorus, son of king Orodes, then seized Syria. P. Ventidius Bassus was sent there afterward. He defeated the Parthians, killed Pacorus, and fully restored Rome’s position.
The Epitome of Livy states that "in the year of Rome 640, the Cimbri, a wandering tribe, made a predatory incursion into Illyricum, where they routed the consul Papirius Carbo with his army." According to Strabo, Carbo was defeated at Noreia, a town of the Taurisci near Aquileia. In the following years, the Cimbri and Teutonia devastated Gaul and caused great suffering there. But the Gauls’ unwavering courage eventually discouraged the invaders, who turned elsewhere, as Caesar records in Bell. Gal. vii. 17. The invaders then entered Italy and sent ambassadors to the Senate, demanding land to settle on. The Senate refused their demand. The consul M. Junius Silanus then fought an unsuccessful battle against them in the year of Rome 645. (Epitome of Livy, lxv.)
"L. Cassius the consul, in the year of Rome 647, was cut off with his army in the confines of the Allobroges, by the Tigurine Gauls, a canton of the Helvetians (now the cantons of Zurich, Appenzell, Schaffhausen, &c.), who had migrated from their settlements. The soldiers who survived the slaughter gave hostages for the payment of half they were worth, to be dismissed with safety." (Ibid.) Caesar also reports that the Tigurini forced the Roman army to pass under the yoke: "This single canton, migrating from home, within the memory of our fathers, slew the consul L. Cassius, and passed his army under the yoke." Bell. Gall. i. 12.
M. Aurelius Scaurus was the consul's lieutenant (or rather consul, since he appears to have held that office in the year of Rome 646). The Cimbri defeated and captured him. When asked for advice, he urged the Cimbri not to cross the Alps into Italy, assuring them the Romans were invincible. A furious young man named Boiorix then killed him. (Epit. Livy, lxvii.)
Florus likewise treats these two events separately: "Neither could Silanus sustain the first onset of the barbarians; nor Manlius, the second; nor Caepio, the third." (iii. 3.) Livy combines them: "By the same enemy (the Cimbri) Cn. Manlius the consul, and Q. Servilius Caepio the proconsul, were defeated in an engagement, and both dispossessed of their camps." (Epit. lxvii.) Paulus Orosius gives a more detailed account: "Manlius the consul, and Q. Caepio, proconsul, being sent against the Cimbri, Teutones, Tigurini, and Ambronae, Gaulish and German nations, who had conspired to extinguish the Roman empire, divided their respective provinces by the river Rhone. Here, the most violent dissensions prevailing between them, they were both overcome, to the great disgrace and danger of the Roman name. According to Antias, 80,000 Romans and allies were slaughtered. Caepio, by whose rashness this misfortune was occasioned, was condemned, and his property confiscated by order of the Roman people." (Lib. v. 16.) These events took place in the year of Rome 649. The anniversary was considered an unlucky day.
The Republic, as opposed to Rome under the emperors.
This tragic disaster affected Augustus deeply. As Seutonius tells us, "he was said to have let his beard and hair grow for several months; during which he at times struck his head against the doors, crying out, 'Varus, restore my legions!' and ever after kept the anniversary as a day of mourning." (Aug. s. 23.) Perhaps the finest historical scene any writer has ever described is Tacitus's account of Germanicus's army visiting the battlefield. Six years after the battle, the soldiers performed funeral rites for the scattered remains of their slaughtered countrymen. (Annals, i. 61.)
"After so many misfortunes, the Roman people thought no general so capable of repelling such formidable enemies, as Marius." Events proved the public right. In his fourth consulate, in the year of Rome 652, "Marius engaged the Teutoni beyond the Alps near Aquae Sextiae (Aix in Province), killing, on the day of battle and the following day, above 150,000 of the enemy, and entirely cutting off the Teutonic nation." (Velleus Paterculus, ii. 12.) Livy reports 200,000 killed and 90,000 taken prisoner. The following year, Marius defeated the Cimbri, who had entered Italy and crossed the Adige. The battle took place on the Raudian plain, where Rubio now stands. He killed or captured more than 100,000 men. Yet the resistance he faced even from their women suggests his victory over this warlike people came at a cost. Florus (iii. 3) tells us that "he was obliged to sustain an engagement with their wives, as well as themselves; who, entrenching themselves on all sides with wagons and cars, fought from them, as from towers, with lances and poles. Their death was no less glorious than their resistance. For, when they could not obtain from Marius what they requested by an embassy, their liberty, and admission into the vestal priesthood (which, indeed, could not lawfully be granted); after strangling their infants, they either fell by mutual wounds, or hung themselves on trees or the poles of their carriages in ropes made of their own hair. King Boiorix was slain, not unrevenged, fighting bravely in the field." For these great victories, Marius celebrated a triumph over the Teutoni, Ambroni, and Cimbri in the year of Borne 652.
In the 596th year of Rome, Julius Caesar defeated Ariovistus, a German king, near Dampierre in the Franche-Comte. He pursued the defeated troops thirty miles towards the Rhine, killing many and filling all that distance with spoils and bodies. (Bell. Gall. i. 33 and 52.) Caesar had previously punished the Tigurini, who, as already mentioned, had defeated and killed L. Cassius. Drusus: He was Livia's son and the emperor Tiberius's brother. He was in Germany B.C. 12, 11. His losses came mainly from shipwreck on the coast of the Chauci. See Lynam's Roman Emperors, i. 37, 45. Nero: i.e. Tiberius, who later became emperor. His name was Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero. See Lynam's Roman Emperors, i. 51, 53, 62, 78. Germanicus: He was Drusus's son and therefore Tiberius's nephew. His victories in Germany took place A.D. 14-16. Like his father, he too was shipwrecked, and in nearly the same spot. See Lynam's Roman Emperors, i. 103-118.
In the war of Civilis, described by Tacitus, Hist. iv. and v.
By Domitian, as described in more detail in the Life of Agricola.
38. We have now to speak of the Suevi; who do not compose a single state, like the Catti or Tencteri, but occupy the greatest part of Germany, and are still distributed into different names and nations, although all hearing the common appellation of Suevi. It is a characteristic of this people to turn their hair sideways, and tie it beneath the poll in a knot. By this mark the Suevi are distinguished from the rest of the Germans; and the freemen of the Suevi from the slaves. Among other nations, this mode, either on account of some relationship with the Suevi, or from the usual propensity to imitation, is sometimes adopted; but rarely, and only during the period of youth. The Suevi, even till they are hoary, continue to have their hair growing stiffly backwards, and often it is fastened on the very crown of the head. The chiefs dress it with still greater care: and in this respect they study ornament, though of an undebasing kind. For their design is not to make love, or inspire it; they decorate themselves in this manner as they proceed to war, in order to seem taller and more terrible; and dress for the eyes of their enemies.
38. We now turn to the Suevi. Unlike the Catti or Tencteri, they do not form a single state. Instead, they occupy the largest part of Germany and remain divided into nations with different names. Yet all share the common name of Suevi. Their distinctive custom is to sweep their hair sideways and tie it in a knot below the back of the head. This hairstyle distinguishes the Suevi from the other Germans, and free Suevi from slaves. Among other nations, some adopt this style because of a relationship with the Suevi or the usual tendency to imitate others. But they do so rarely, and only while young. The Suevi keep their hair swept stiffly backward even when they turn gray. Often, they fasten it on the very top of the head. The chiefs arrange their hair with still greater care. In this respect, they seek adornment, though not of a degrading kind. Their aim is neither to court others nor to attract love. They decorate themselves this way when going to war, to look taller and more terrifying. They dress for the eyes of their enemies.
The Suevi held the vast territory between the Elbe, the Vistula, the Baltic Sea, and the Danube. Their territory had once extended even further, reaching the Rhine. As a result, Strabo, Caesar, Florus, and others attributed to the Suevi what concerned the Catti.
Among the Suevi and the other Germans, slaves seem to have had their heads shaved. Or at least their hair was cut too short to twist or tie into a knot.
39. The Semnones assert themselves to be the most ancient and noble of the Suevi; and their pretensions are confirmed by religion. At a stated time, all the people of the same lineage assemble by their delegates in a wood, consecrated by the auguries of their forefathers and ancient terror, and there by the public slaughter of a human victim celebrate the horrid origin of their barbarous rites. Another kind of reverence is paid to the grove. No person enters it without being bound with a chain, as an acknowledgment of his inferior nature, and the power of the deity residing there. If he accidentally fall, it is not lawful for him to be lifted or to rise up; they roll themselves out along the ground. The whole of their superstition has this import: that from this spot the nation derives its origin; that here is the residence of the Deity, the Governor of all, and that everything else is subject and subordinate to him. These opinions receive additional authority from the power of the Semnones, who inhabit a hundred cantons, and, from the great body they compose, consider themselves as the head of the Suevi.
39. The Semnones claim to be the oldest and noblest of the Suevi, and their religion supports these claims. At a set time, all peoples of the same ancestry send representatives to gather in a wood. Their ancestors’ omens and an ancient sense of dread have made this wood sacred. There, they publicly slaughter a human victim to celebrate the terrible origin of their barbarous rites. The grove receives another form of reverence. No one enters without being bound with a chain, acknowledging their own inferior nature and the resident deity’s power. If anyone accidentally falls, they may not be helped up or rise on their own. They must roll along the ground to leave the grove. Their whole superstition means this: their nation originated in this place. Here lives the Deity, the ruler of all, and everything else is subject and subordinate to him. These beliefs gain further authority from the power of the Semnones, who occupy a hundred districts. Because of their great numbers, they consider themselves the foremost people among the Suevi.
The Semnones lived on both banks of the Viadrus (Oder). Their territory is now part of Pomerania, the Marche of Brandenburg, and Lusatia.
40. The Langobardi, on the other hand, are ennobled by, the smallness of their numbers; since though surrounded by many powerful nations, they derive security, not from obsequiousness, but from their martial enterprise. The neighboring Reudigni, and the Avions, Angli, Varini, Eudoses, Suardones, and Nuithones, are defended by rivers or forests. Nothing remarkable occurs in any of these; except that they unite in the worship of Hertha, or Mother Earth; and suppose her to interfere in the affairs of men, and to visit the different nations. In an island of the ocean stands a sacred and unviolated grove, in which is a consecrated chariot, covered with a veil, which the priest alone is permitted to touch. He becomes conscious of the entrance of the goddess into this secret recess; and with profound veneration attends the vehicle, which is drawn by yoked cows. At this season, all is joy; and every place which the goddess deigns to visit is a scene of festivity. No wars are undertaken; arms are untouched; and every hostile weapon is shut up. Peace abroad and at home are then only known; then only loved; till at length the same priest reconducts the goddess, satiated with mortal intercourse, to her temple. The chariot, with its curtain, and, if we may believe it, the goddess herself, then undergo ablution in a secret lake. This office is performed by slaves, whom the same lake instantly swallows up. Hence proceeds a mysterious horror; and a holy ignorance of what that can be, which is beheld only by those who are about to perish. This part of the Suevian nation extends to the most remote recesses of Germany.
40. The Langobardi, on the other hand, gain distinction from their small numbers. Although surrounded by many powerful nations, they find safety not through submission, but through their fighting spirit. The neighboring Reudigni, and the Avions, Angli, Varini, Eudoses, Suardones, and Nuithones, are protected by rivers or forests. None of these peoples has anything remarkable about them, except that all worship Hertha, or Mother Earth. They believe she intervenes in human affairs and visits the different nations. On an island in the ocean stands a sacred grove that no one has violated. Within the grove is a consecrated chariot, covered with a veil, which only the priest may touch. The priest senses when the goddess enters this hidden place. With deep reverence, he accompanies the chariot, drawn by cows yoked together. During this season, all is joy. Every place the goddess chooses to visit becomes a scene of celebration. No wars are begun, weapons remain untouched, and every weapon of war is locked away. Only then do people know peace at home and abroad, and only then do they love it. At last, when the goddess has had her fill of human company, the same priest returns her to her temple. The chariot and its curtain are then washed in a hidden lake, along with, if we can believe it, the goddess herself. Slaves perform this task, and the same lake immediately swallows them. This gives rise to a mysterious terror and a sacred ignorance. What is seen only by those about to die remains unknown. This part of the Suevian nation extends into the most remote regions of Germany.
During the reign of Augustus, the Langobardi lived on this side of the Elbe, between Luneburg and Magdeburg. After Tiberius conquered them and drove them beyond the Elbe, they settled in what is now Prignitz, Ruppin, and part of the Middle Marche. They later founded the Lombard kingdom in Italy. In 774, Charlemagne destroyed that kingdom, captured their king Desiderius, and subdued all Italy. The laws of the Langobardi still survive and can be found in Lindenbrog. Tacitus does not mention the Burgundians, probably because they were then a minor people. Later, the Burgundians joined the Langobardi and settled on the Decuman lands and along the Roman boundary. From there, the Burgundians invaded Gaul and seized the region still named Burgundy after them. Their laws also survive.
Based on Tacitus's description, the Reudigni must have lived in parts of the present duchy of Mecklenburg and of Lauenburg. They had previously settled on this side of the Elbe, on the sands of Luneburg.
Perhaps these were the same people Mamertinus called the Chaibones in his Panegyric on Maximian. Given their proximity to the nations mentioned above, they must have inhabited part of the duchy of Mecklenburg. They had previously lived on this side of the Elbe, along the river Ilmenavia in Luneburg. The river is now called Ava, which probably gave the people their name.
Inhabitants of what is now part of Holstein and Sleswig. This area still includes a district called Angeln, between Flensborg and Sleswig. In the fifth century, the Angles migrated to Britain with the Saxons. The Angles gave England its name, preserving their own name in it.
Tacitus’s list and the locations of the other tribes suggest that the Eudoses must have occupied modern Wismar and Rostock. The Suardones must have occupied Stralsund, Swedish Pomerania, and parts of Hither Pomerania and the Uckerane Marche. Eccard, however, supposes these peoples occupied much larger areas. He places the Eudoses along the Oder, the Suardones along the Warte, and the Nuithones along the Netze.
The goddess Herth’s ancient name lives on in the German Erde and the English Earth.
Many believe this island was the isle of Rugen in the Baltic sea. More likely, however, it was an island near the mouth of the Elbe, now called Helgeland, or Heiligeland (Holy Island). Besides the evidence of its name, its location fits better with those of the peoples listed earlier.
Olaus Rudbeck argues that this festival was celebrated in winter and still continues in Scandinavia as Julifred, the peace of Juul. (Yule is the term for the Christmas season in old English and Scottish dialects.) But this feast honored the Sun, called Thor or Taranium by them, rather than the Earth. The festival of Herth was held later, in February, as noted in Mallet's "Introduction to the History of Denmark."
Templo here means only "the consecrated place," i.e. the grove mentioned earlier. This is because, according to c.9, the Germans built no temples.
41. If we now follow the course of the Danube, as we before did that of the Rhine, we first meet with the Hermunduri; a people faithful to the Romans, and on that account the only Germans who are admitted to commerce, not on the bank alone, but within our territories, and in the flourishing colony established in the province of Rhaetia. They pass and repass at pleasure, without being attended by a guard; and while we exhibit to other nations our arms and camps alone, to these we lay open our houses and country seats, which they behold without coveting. In the country of the Hermunduri rises the Elbe; a river formerly celebrated and known among us, now only heard of by name.
41. If we now follow the Danube, as we previously followed the Rhine, we first encounter the Hermunduri. These people are loyal to the Romans. For that reason, they alone among the Germans are allowed to trade not just along the riverbank, but within our territory. They can even trade in the thriving colony established in the province of Rhaetia. They come and go freely, without a guard accompanying them. While we show other nations only our weapons and camps, we open our homes and country estates to the Hermunduri. They view these places without wanting to possess them. The Elbe rises in the country of the Hermunduri. This river was once famous and familiar to us, but now we know it only by name.
It is thought that these people were called Heermanner because of their bravery. The Romans changed the name to Hermunduri. They first settled between the Elbe, the Sala, and Bohemia. This area now includes Anhalt, Voightland, Saxony, part of Misnia, and part of Franconia. Later, the Marcomanni took possession of Bohemia, from which Maroboduus had expelled the Boii. The Hermunduri then added those settlements to their own and established the Suevian name there. The country’s modern name, Suabia, comes from that name.
They were so at that time. But later they joined the Marcomanni and other Germans against the Romans under Marcus Aurelius, who defeated them.
Augusta Vindelicorum, now Augsburg, was a famous Roman colony in the province of Rhaetia. Vindelica was then part of Rhaetia.
Tacitus is badly mistaken if he confuses the source of the Egra with that of the Elbe. The Egra rises in the country of the Hermuduri, while the Elbe rises in Bohemia. As Tacitus notes, the Romans once knew the Elbe well through the victories of Drusus, Tiberius, and Domitius. But later, as the Germans grew stronger and kept Roman armies away, the Romans heard only vague reports about the river. Its source was therefore probably marked inaccurately on Roman maps. Perhaps, however, after serving in the army of Maroboduus, the Hermunduri received lands in the part of Bohemia where the Elbe rises. If so, Tacitus's account would contain no mistake.
42. Contiguous to the Hermunduri are the Narisci; and next to them, the Marcomanni and Quadi. Of these, the Marcomanni are the most powerful and renowned; and have even acquired the country which they inhabit, by their valor in expelling the Boii. Nor are the Narisci and Quadi inferior in bravery; and this is, as it were, the van of Germany as far as it is bordered by the Danube. Within our memory the Marcomanni and Quadi were governed by kings of their own nation, of the noble line of Maroboduus and Tudrus. They now submit even to foreigners; but all the power of their kings depends upon the authority of the Romans. We seldom assist them with our arms, but frequently with our money; nor are they the less potent on that account.
42. The Narisci border the Hermunduri. Next to the Narisci are the Marcomanni and Quadi. Of these peoples, the Marcomanni are the most powerful and famous. They even won the land they now inhabit through their bravery in driving out the Boii. The Narisci and Quadi are no less brave. These peoples form, so to speak, Germany’s front line along its border with the Danube. Within living memory, the Marcomanni and Quadi were ruled by kings from their own peoples. These kings came from the noble families of Maroboduus and Tudrus. Now these peoples even accept foreign rulers, but all their kings’ power depends on Roman authority. We seldom support these kings with military force, but often with money. Yet their power is no less great for that.
People living in the part of Bavaria between Bohemia and the Danube.
People living in Bohemia.
Inhabitants of Moravia and the part of Austria between Moravia and the Danube. Ammianus Marcellinus describes this people in his account of the reign of Valentinian and Valens: "A sudden commotion arose among the Quadi; a nation at present of little consequence, but which was formerly extremely warlike and potent, as their exploits sufficiently evince." xxix. 15.
Their expulsion of the Boii, who gave Bohemia its name, has already been mentioned. Before then, the Marcomanni lived near the sources of the Danube, in what is now the duchy of Wirtemburg. Dithmar suggests they were called Marcmanner because they lived on Germany’s borders. The name comes from Marc (the same as the old English March), meaning a border or boundary.
These people proved their military reputation by joining the Marcomanni in launching a dangerous war against the Romans. The war took place during the reign of Marcus Aurelius.
Tacitus mentions this prince and his alliance with the Romans against Arminius in Annals, ii.
Thus Tiberius made Vannius king of the Quadi. (See Annals, ii. 63.) Later, Antoninus Pius gave the Quadi Furtius as king, as a medal preserved in Spanheim shows. The Quadi then expelled Furtius and placed Ariogaesus on the throne. But Marcus Aurelius, who disliked Ariogaesus, refused to confirm the election. (Dio, lxxi.)
43. Behind these are the Marsigni, Gothini, Osi, and Burrii, who close the rear of the Marcomanni and Quadi. Of these, the Marsigni and Burrii in language and dress resemble the Suevi. The Gothini and Osi prove themselves not to be Germans; the first, by their use of the Gallic, the second, of the Pannonian tongue; and both, by their submitting to pay tribute: which is levied on them, as aliens, partly by the Sarmatians, partly by the Quadi. The Gothini, to their additional disgrace, work iron mines. All these people inhabit but a small proportion of champaign country; their settlements are chiefly amongst forests, and on the sides and summits of mountains; for a continued ridge of mountains separates Suevia from various remoter tribes. Of these, the Lygian is the most extensive, and diffuses its name through several communities. It will be sufficient to name the most powerful of them—the Arii, Helvecones, Manimi, Elysii, and Naharvali. In the country of the latter is a grove, consecrated to religious rites of great antiquity. A priest presides over them, dressed in woman's apparel; but the gods worshipped there are said, according to the Roman interpretation, to be Castor and Pollux. Their attributes are the same; their name, Alcis. No images, indeed, or vestiges of foreign superstition, appear in their worship; but they are revered under the character of young men and brothers. The Arii, fierce beyond the superiority of strength they possess over the other just enumerated people, improve their natural ferocity of aspect by artificial helps. Their shields are black; their bodies painted: they choose the darkest nights for an attack; and strike terror by the funereal gloom of their sable bands—no enemy being able to sustain their singular, and, as it were, infernal appearance; since in every combat the eyes are the first part subdued. Beyond the Lygii are the Gothones, who live under a monarchy, somewhat more strict than that of the other German nations, yet not to a degree incompatible with liberty. Adjoining to these are the Rugii and Lemovii, situated on the sea-coast—all these tribes are distinguished by round shields, short swords, and submission to regal authority.
43. Behind these are the Marsigni, Gothini, Osi, and Burrii, who guard the rear of the Marcomanni and Quadi. Of these, the Marsigni and Burrii resemble the Suevi in language and dress. The Gothini and Osi show that they are not Germans through their languages. The Gothini speak Gallic, and the Osi speak Pannonian. Both peoples also show this by submitting to tribute. As foreigners, they pay tribute partly to the Sarmatians and partly to the Quadi. To their further disgrace, the Gothini work in iron mines. All these peoples occupy only a small amount of open, level country. Their settlements are mostly among forests and on mountainsides and summits. A continuous mountain range separates Suevia from various more distant tribes. Of these, the Lygian people are the most widespread, and several communities share their name. It is enough to name the most powerful: the Arii, Helvecones, Manimi, Elysii, and Naharvali. In the country of the Naharvali is a grove dedicated to religious rites of great antiquity. A priest dressed in women's clothing presides over these rites. According to the Roman interpretation, the gods worshipped there are said to be Castor and Pollux. Their attributes are the same, and their name is Alcis. Their worship contains no images or traces of foreign religious practices. But the gods are revered as young men and brothers. The Arii surpass the other peoples just listed in strength, and even more in fierceness. They use artificial means to make their naturally fierce appearance still more terrifying. Their shields are black, and their bodies are painted. They choose the darkest nights to attack. Their black-clad bands spread terror with their deathlike gloom. No enemy can withstand their strange, almost hellish appearance, since in every battle the eyes are the first to surrender. Beyond the Lygii are the Gothones, who live under a monarchy. Their kings rule somewhat more strictly than those of other German nations, but not so strictly as to prevent freedom. Next to the Gothones, along the coast, are the Rugii and Lemovii. All these tribes are distinguished by round shields, short swords, and obedience to kings.
These people lived in what is now Galatz, Jagerndorf, and part of Silesia.
People living in part of Silesia and in Hungary.
People living in part of Hungary extending to the Danube.
They lived around the Carpathian mountains and the sources of the Vistula.
The Suevi probably differed from the other Germans in their distinct dialect, as well as their clothing and customs.
Ptolemy mentions iron mines in or near the country of the Quadi. I suspect the phrase "additional disgrace" means more than the slavery of working in mines. More literally, the phrase means "which might make them more ashamed". The added disgrace was digging up iron, the very material that could help them gain freedom and independence. This interpretation is typical of Tacitus’s style. Ancient writers used the word iron figuratively to mean military force in general. In his well-known answer to Croesus, Solon said that the nation with more iron would control all Croesus’s gold. Aikin.
The mountains between Moravia, Hungary, Silesia, and Bohemia.
The Lygii lived in parts of what are now Silesia, the New Marche, Prussia, and Poland on this side of the Vistula.
These tribes lived between the Oder and Vistula, in what are now parts of Silesia, Brandenburg, and Poland. The Elysii are thought to have given Silesia its name.
The Greeks and Romans worshipped the glowing vapors that appear on ships’ masts during storms as the Dioscuri, or Castor and Pollux. These lights are thought to signal an approaching calm. Roman Catholics still show a kind of religious reverence for this phenomenon, calling it the fire of St. Elmo. The Naharvali seem to have treated the ignis fatuus as divine in the same way. The name Alcis is probably the same as Alff or Alp. Northern peoples still use these names for the imagined spirits of the mountains. The Sarmatian deities Lebus and Polebus, whose memory survives in Polish festivals, perhaps had the same origin.
No custom has been more widespread among uncivilized peoples than body painting, either for decoration or to inspire terror.
They lived in what is now Further Pomerania, the New Marche and western Poland, between the Oder and Vistula. They were a different people from the Goths, though perhaps allied with them.
These people lived on the Baltic coast, where Colburg, Cassubia, and Further Pomerania are now. Their name survives in the town of Rugenwald and the Isle of Rugen.
These settlers also lived on the Baltic, near modern Stolpe, Dantzig, and Lauenburg. The Heruli seem to have later occupied the settlements of the Lemovii. No further mention is made of the Lemovii. But the Heruli became famous throughout Europe and Asia. They were the first Germans to establish a kingdom in Italy under Odoacer.
44. Next occur the communities of the Suiones, seated in the very Ocean, who, besides their strength in men and arms, also possess a naval force. The form of their vessels differs from ours in having a prow at each end, so that they are always ready to advance. They make no use of sails, nor have regular benches of oars at the sides: they row, as is practised in some rivers, without order, sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other, as occasion requires. These people honor wealth; for which reason they are subject to monarchical government, without any limitations, or precarious conditions of allegiance. Nor are arms allowed to be kept promiscuously, as among the other German nations: but are committed to the charge of a keeper, and he, too, a slave. The pretext is, that the Ocean defends them from any sudden incursions; and men unemployed, with arms in their hands, readily become licentious. In fact, it is for the king's interest not to entrust a noble, a freeman, or even an emancipated slave, with the custody of arms.
44. Next come the communities of the Suiones, who live in the Ocean itself. Besides their strength in men and weapons, they also have a navy. Their ships differ from ours by having a prow at each end, so they are always ready to move forward. They use no sails and have no fixed rows of oars along the sides. As on some rivers, they row without a set arrangement, sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other, as needed. These people honor wealth. For this reason, they live under a king whose power has no limits, and their allegiance has no uncertain conditions. Nor can everyone keep weapons, as among the other German nations. Instead, the weapons are entrusted to a keeper, who is himself a slave. The excuse is that the Ocean protects them from sudden attacks. Also, idle men with weapons in their hands easily become lawless. In fact, the king's interests are best served by keeping weapons out of the custody of nobles, freemen, and even freed slaves.
The Suiones lived in Sweden and the Danish islands of Funen, Langlaud, Zeeland, Laland, and others. The Normans descended from the Suiones and the Cimbri. After spreading terror through various parts of the empire, the Normans finally seized the fertile province of Normandy in France. The Goths, Visigoths, and Ostrogoths became even more famous because these peoples brought about the Roman empire’s downfall. The laws of the Visigoths still survive, but differ greatly from the usual simplicity of German laws.
The Romans knew little about this part of the world. They imagined it contained the "vast insular tracts" mentioned at the beginning of this treatise. So Pliny also says of the Baltic sea (Codanus sinus) that "it is filled with islands, the most famous of which, Scandinavia (now Sweden and Norway), is of an undiscovered magnitude; that part of it only being known which is occupied by the Hilleviones, a nation inhabiting five hundred cantons; who call this country another globe." (Lib. iv. 13.) The name Halland, a region of Sweden, still preserves the memory of the Hilleviones.
Their naval power remained so great that they earned the honor of creating the nautical code. Its laws were first written in the eleventh century at Wisby, the capital of the isle of Gothland.
Indian canoes have exactly this shape, but they are generally powered by sails as well as oars.
Adam of Bremen (Eccl. Hist. ch. 233) describes the great wealth of a temple of the Suiones. This wealth proves that naval power has always brought riches. "This nation," says he, "possesses a temple of great renown, called Ubsola (now Upsal), not far from the cities Sictona and Birca (now Sigtuna and Bioerkoe). In this temple, which is entirely ornamented with gold, the people worship the statues of three gods; the most powerful of whom, Thor, is seated on a couch in the middle; with Woden on one side, and Fricca on the other." Stockholm, Sweden's present capital, arose from the ruins of the towns Sictona and Birca.
Spener (Notit. German. Antiq.) therefore rightly concludes that the Suiones inherited their crown rather than electing their rulers.
45. Beyond the Suiones is another sea, sluggish and almost stagnant, by which the whole globe is imagined to be girt and enclosed, from this circumstance, that the last light of the setting sun continues so vivid till its rising, as to obscure the stars. Popular belief adds, that the sound of his emerging from the ocean is also heard; and the forms of deities, with the rays beaming from his head, are beheld. Only thus far, report says truly, does nature extend. On the right shore of the Suevic sea dwell the tribes of the Aestii, whose dress and customs are the same with those of the Suevi, but their language more resembles the British. They worship the mother of the gods; and as the symbol of their superstition, they carry about them the figures of wild boars. This serves them in place of armor and every other defence: it renders the votary of the goddess safe even in the midst of foes. Their weapons are chiefly clubs, iron being little used among them. They cultivate corn and other fruits of the earth with more industry than German indolence commonly exerts. They even explore the sea; and are the only people who gather amber, which by them is called Glese, and is collected among the shallows and upon the shore. With the usual indifference of barbarians, they have not inquired or ascertained from what natural object or by what means it is produced. It long lay disregarded amidst other things thrown up by the sea, till our luxury gave it a name. Useless to them, they gather it in the rough; bring it unwrought; and wonder at the price they receive. It would appear, however, to be an exudation from certain trees; since reptiles, and even winged animals, are often seen shining through it, which, entangled in it while in a liquid state, became enclosed as it hardened. I should therefore imagine that, as the luxuriant woods and groves in the secret recesses of the East exude frankincense and balsam, so there are the same in the islands and continents of the West; which, acted upon by the near rays of the sun, drop their liquid juices into the subjacent sea, whence, by the force of tempests, they are thrown out upon the opposite coasts. If the nature of amber be examined by the application of fire, it kindles like a torch, with a thick and odorous flame; and presently resolves into a glutinous matter resembling pitch or resin. The several communities of the Sitones succeed those of the Suiones; to whom they are similar in other respects, but differ in submitting to a female reign; so far have they degenerated, not only from liberty, but even from slavery. Here Suevia terminates.
45. Beyond the Suiones lies another sea, sluggish and almost stagnant. People imagine that this sea surrounds and encloses the whole globe for the following reason. The last light of the setting sun stays so bright until sunrise that it hides the stars. Popular belief adds that the sound of the sun rising from the ocean can also be heard. People also claim to see the forms of deities, with rays shining from the sun’s head. Only this far, as report truly says, does nature extend. On the right shore of the Suevic sea live the tribes of the Aestii. Their dress and customs are the same as those of the Suevi, but their language more closely resembles British. They worship the mother of the gods. As a symbol of their superstition, they carry figures of wild boars. These figures take the place of armor and every other defense. They keep the goddess’s worshipper safe even among enemies. Their weapons are mainly clubs, since they make little use of iron. They grow grain and other crops more diligently than German laziness usually allows. They even search the sea. They are the only people who gather amber, which they call Glese. They collect it in the shallows and along the shore. With the usual indifference of barbarians, they have neither investigated nor established what natural substance produces amber, or how. Amber long lay unnoticed among other things washed up by the sea, until our luxury gave it a name. Amber is useless to them. They gather it raw, bring it unworked, and marvel at the price they receive. Amber would seem, however, to be a substance secreted by certain trees. Reptiles and even winged creatures can often be seen through it. These creatures became trapped while the amber was liquid and were enclosed as it hardened. I would therefore imagine that the islands and mainlands of the West have trees like those in the East. In the East’s hidden regions, lush woods and groves release frankincense and balsam. Likewise, the nearby rays of the sun cause the western trees to drip their liquid sap into the sea below. Storms then throw the sap onto the opposite shores. If amber is tested with fire, it catches like a torch, burning with a thick, strong-smelling flame. It soon dissolves into a sticky substance resembling pitch or resin. The various communities of the Sitones lie beyond those of the Suiones. They resemble the Suiones in other respects, but differ in submitting to a woman’s rule. So far have they sunk, not only below freedom, but even below slavery. Here Suevia ends.
The reference may be to what is now called the Frozen Ocean, or to the northernmost parts of the Baltic Sea. These are the Gulfs of Bothnia and Finland, which freeze so heavily each winter that ships cannot navigate them.
Astronomy now explains why, at a certain latitude, the sun appears never to set at the summer solstice. It also explains why, at a lower latitude, evening twilight lasts until morning.
The correct reading here is probably "immerging;" because people commonly believed the sun hissed as it sank into the ocean. The sound was thought to resemble red-hot iron dipped into water. Thus Juvenal, Sat. xiv, 280: Audiet Herculeo stridentem gurgite solem. "Hear the sun hiss in the Herculean gulf."
Instead of formas deorum, "forms of deities," some read equorum, "of the horses," a more likely reading. These horses are imagined to pull the sun’s chariot.
Thus, Quintus Curtius says of the Indian Ocean, "Nature itself can proceed no further."
The Baltic Sea.
Now the kingdom of Prussia, the duchies of Samogitia and Courland, and the palatinates of Livonia and Esthonia. The name Esthonia preserves the ancient name of these people.
Because the people in this farthest part of Germany still spoke the Scythico-Celtic language, long dominant in Britain.
A deity of Scythian origin named Frea or Fricca. See Mallet's Introduct. to Hist. of Denmark.
Many traces of this superstition remain in Sweden to this day. In February, once sacred to Frea, peasants make little boar figures from dough and use them for various superstitious purposes. (See Eccard.) Mr. Pennant includes an illustration of a Mater Deum with the boar in his Tour in Scotland, 1769, p. 268. The engraving is based on a stone found at the large station at Netherby in Cumberland.
The cause was probably their limited territory, which prevented them from roaming in hunting and raiding parties like other Germans.
This name was applied to glass when glass came into use. Pliny describes amber production in this country: "It is certain that amber is produced in the islands of the Northern Ocean, and is called by the Germans gless. One of these islands, by the natives named Austravia, was on this account called Glessaria by our sailors in the fleet of Germanicus." (Lib. xxxvii. 3.)
Much Prussian amber is still collected on the shores of the Baltic. Much is also found washed out of the clay cliffs of Holderness. See Tour in Scotland, 1769, p. 16.
So much so that the Guttones, who once lived on this coast, used amber as fuel. They also sold amber as fuel to the neighboring Teutones. (Plin. xxxvii. 2.)
Romans who lived in luxury owned various amber trinkets and utensils, including bracelets, necklaces, rings, cups, and even pillars.
Goeppert and Berendt’s "Amber and the Fossil Remains of Plants contained in it" was published in Berlin in 1845. The following passage, given here in translation, closely agrees with Tacitus’s account: "About the parts which are known by the name of Samland an island emerged, or rather a group of islands, ... which gradually increased in circumference, and, favored by a mild sea climate, was overspread with vegetation and forest. This forest was the means of amber being produced. Certain trees in it exuded gums in such quantities that the sunken forest soil now appears to be filled with it to such a degree, as if it had only been deprived of a very trifling part of its contents by the later eruptions of the sea, and the countless storms which have lashed the ocean for centuries." Thus, although amber is found underground, it appears to have originally come from some resinous tree. This origin also explains the insects and other things found in amber, as Tacitus mentions.
Norwegians.
46. I am in doubt whether to reckon the Peucini, Venedi, and Fenni among the Germans or Sarmatians; although the Peucini, who are by some called Bastarnae, agree with the Germans in language, apparel, and habitations. All of them live in filth and laziness. The intermarriages of their chiefs with the Sarmatians have debased them by a mixture of the manners of that people. The Venedi have drawn much from this source; for they overrun in their predatory excursions all the woody and mountainous tracts between the Peucini and Fenni. Yet even these are rather to be referred to the Germans, since they build houses, carry shields, and travel with speed on foot; in all which particulars they totally differ from the Sarmatians, who pass their time in wagons and on horseback. The Fenni live in a state of amazing savageness and squalid poverty. They are destitute of arms, horses, and settled abodes: their food is herbs; their clothing, skins; their bed, the ground. Their only dependence is on their arrows, which, for want of iron, are headed with bone; and the chase is the support of the women as well as the men; the former accompany the latter in the pursuit, and claim a share of the prey. Nor do they provide any other shelter for their infants from wild beasts and storms, than a covering of branches twisted together. This is the resort of youth; this is the receptacle of old age. Yet even this way of life is in their estimation happier than groaning over the plough; toiling in the erection of houses; subjecting their own fortunes and those of others to the agitations of alternate hope and fear. Secure against men, secure against the gods, they have attained the most difficult point, not to need even a wish.
46. I am unsure whether to count the Peucini, Venedi, and Fenni among the Germans or Sarmatians. Yet the Peucini, whom some call Bastarnae, resemble the Germans in language, clothing, and homes. All of them live in filth and idleness. Their chiefs have married Sarmatians, and adopting some Sarmatian customs has degraded them. The Venedi have adopted much from the same source. For they raid all the wooded and mountainous regions between the Peucini and Fenni. Yet even the Venedi should be counted as Germans, since they build houses, carry shields, and move quickly on foot. In all these ways, they differ completely from the Sarmatians, who spend their time in wagons and on horseback. The Fenni live in astonishing savagery and wretched poverty. They have no weapons, horses, or permanent homes. They eat plants, wear skins, and sleep on the ground. They rely entirely on their arrows, tipped with bone because they lack iron. Hunting supports women as well as men. The women join the men in the hunt and claim a share of the kill. They give their infants no shelter from wild beasts and storms except a covering of woven branches. The young take refuge there, and the old find shelter there too. Yet they consider even this life happier than groaning over the plow or laboring to build houses. They prefer it to exposing their own fortunes and those of others to alternating hope and fear. Safe from men and safe from the gods, they have achieved the hardest thing of all: having nothing even to wish for.
All land beyond the Vistula was considered part of Sarmatia. These people were therefore inhabitants of Sarmatia, though their customs suggested German origins.
Pliny also counts the Peucini among the German nations: "The fifth part of Germany is possessed by the Peucini and Bastarnae, who border on the Dacians." (iv. 14.) Strabo indicates that the Peucini, a branch of the Bastarnae, lived around the mouths of the Danube. They lived particularly on the island of Peuce, now Piczina, formed by the river.
The Peucini lived in permanent homes, while the Sarmatians moved from place to place in their wagons.
"Sordes omnium ac torpor; procerum connubiis mixtis nonnihil in Sarmatarum habitum foedantur." Many editions place the semicolon after procerum, not after torpor. With that punctuation, the passage means: "The chief men are lazy and stupid, besides being filthy, like all the rest. Intermarriage with the Sarmatians have debased." etc.
The Venedi lived beyond the Peucini and Bastarnae, as far as the Baltic Sea. There lies the Sinus Venedicus, now the Gulf of Dantzig. Their name also survives in Wenden, a part of Livonia. When the German nations invaded Italy, France and Spain, the Venedi, also called Winedi, took over the settlements left empty between the Vistula and Elbe. Later, the Venedi crossed the Danube and seized Dalmatia, Illyricum, Istria, Carniola, and the Noric Alps. A part of Carniola still bears the name Windismarck, derived from the Venedi. The Venedi were also called Slavi. Their language, Sclavonian, is still widely spoken across a vast region.
The Nogai Tartars, successors of the Sarmatians, still live this way.
Pliny calls their country Eningia, now Finland. Warnefrid (De Gest. Langobard. i. 5) describes their savage and miserable condition: "The Scritobini, or Scritofinni, are not without snow in the midst of summer; and, being little superior in sagacity to the brutes, live upon no other food than the raw flesh of wild animals, the hairy skins of which they use for clothing. They derive their name, according to the barbarian tongue, from leaping, because they hunt wild beasts by a certain method of leaping or springing with pieces of wood bent in the shape of a bow." This clearly describes snowshoes, or raquets, commonly used by North American savages and inhabitants of Europe's northernmost regions.
As noted just below, they depend mainly on animals hunted for food. So their plant food can only mean wild herbs, not cultivated crops.
The Esquimaux and the South Sea islanders still do the same thing today.
All our further accounts are intermixed with fable; as, that the Hellusii and Oxionae have human faces, with the bodies and limbs of wild beasts. These unauthenticated reports I shall leave untouched.
All our further accounts are mixed with myths. For example, the Hellusii and Oxionae supposedly have human faces, but the bodies and limbs of wild beasts. I will leave these unverified reports alone.
People of Lapland. This fable probably arose from how people dressed in these cold regions. The inhabitants wrap themselves in the thickest furs, leaving barely any sign of a human shape.
This excellent historian shows sound judgment by leaving fabulous tales out of this highly interesting and instructive treatise. Such a mixture might have cast doubt on the reliability of the whole account. Yet despite some critics’ suspicions, the account contains nothing inconsistent with truth and nature. Suppose Tacitus had invented his description of German customs. Could he have portrayed so accurately a people living under similar conditions, the savage tribes of North America? We have observed those tribes within the present century. Would his account have been so strikingly confirmed by the surviving law codes of the various German nations? These include the Salic, Ripuary, Burgundian, English and Lombard codes. Or could the customs, laws and ways of life he describes still be traced among all peoples of German descent? So many centuries and so many changes of empire have passed since his time. As long as people study the original systems of government and law of our own and other European countries, this treatise will remain among the most valuable and reliable records of the ancient world.