Attraction

The discoveries which gained Sir Isaac Newton so universal a reputation, relate to the system of the world, to light, to geometrical infinities; and, lastly, to chronology, with which he used to amuse himself after the fatigue of his severer studies.

Sir Isaac Newton’s discoveries won him worldwide fame. They concerned the workings of the universe, light, infinities in geometry, and finally, chronology. He studied chronology for amusement after tiring himself with his more demanding studies.

I will now acquaint you (without prolixity if possible) with the few things I have been able to comprehend of all these sublime ideas. With regard to the system of our world, disputes were a long time maintained, on the cause that turns the planets, and keeps them in their orbits: and on those causes which make all bodies here below descend towards the surface of the earth.

I will now tell you the few things I have managed to understand about all these lofty ideas. I will be brief, if possible. For a long time, people debated what makes the planets move and keeps them in their orbits. They also debated what makes all bodies here below fall toward the earth’s surface.

The system of Descartes, explained and improved since his time, seemed to give a plausible reason for all those phenomena; and this reason seemed more just, as it is simple and intelligible to all capacities. But in philosophy, a student ought to doubt of the things he fancies he understands too easily, as much as of those he does not understand.

Descartes’ system, explained and improved since his time, seemed to offer a plausible explanation for all those phenomena. The explanation seemed more convincing because it was simple and understandable to everyone. But students of philosophy should doubt what they think they understand too easily just as much as what they cannot understand.

Gravity, the falling of accelerated bodies on the earth, the revolution of the planets in their orbits, their rotations round their axis, all this is mere motion. Now motion cannot perhaps be conceived any otherwise than by impulsion; therefore all those bodies must be impelled. But by what are they impelled? All space is full, it therefore is filled with a very subtile matter, since this is imperceptible to us; this matter goes from west to east, since all the planets are carried from west to east. Thus from hypothesis to hypothesis, from one appearance to another, philosophers have imagined a vast whirlpool of subtile matter, in which the planets are carried round the sun: they also have created another particular vortex which floats in the great one, and which turns daily round the planets. When all this is done, it is pretended that gravity depends on this diurnal motion; for, say these, the velocity of the subtile matter that turns round our little vortex, must be seventeen times more rapid than that of the earth; or, in case its velocity is seventeen times greater than that of the earth, its centrifugal force must be vastly greater, and consequently impel all bodies towards the earth. This is the cause of gravity, according to the Cartesian system. But the theorist, before he calculated the centrifugal force and velocity of the subtile matter, should first have been certain that it existed.

Gravity, the accelerating fall of bodies to earth, the planets’ orbits, and their rotation on their axes are all merely motion. Now perhaps motion can only be understood as the result of a push. Therefore, all these bodies must be pushed. But what pushes them? All space is full. It must therefore contain very fine matter, since we cannot perceive it. This matter moves from west to east, since all the planets are carried from west to east. So, moving from hypothesis to hypothesis, from one appearance to another, philosophers have imagined a vast whirlpool of fine matter. In this whirlpool, the planets are carried around the sun. These philosophers have also created a separate vortex that floats within the great whirlpool and circles the planets daily. With all this in place, they claim that gravity depends on this daily motion. They argue that the fine matter circling our little vortex must move seventeen times faster than the earth. Or, if its speed is seventeen times the earth’s, its centrifugal force must be vastly greater. That greater force must therefore push all bodies toward the earth. This is the cause of gravity according to the Cartesian system. But before calculating the fine matter’s centrifugal force and speed, the theorist should first have made sure that it existed.

Sir Isaac Newton, seems to have destroyed all these great and little vortices, both that which carries the planets round the sun, as well as the other which supposes every planet to turn on its own axis.

Sir Isaac Newton seems to have done away with all these large and small vortices. These include the vortex thought to carry the planets around the sun. They also include the vortex supposed to make every planet spin on its own axis.

First, with regard to the pretended little vortex of the earth, it is demonstrated that it must lose its motion by insensible degrees; it is demonstrated, that if the earth swims in a fluid, its density must be equal to that of the earth; and in case its density be the same, all the bodies we endeavour to move must meet with an insuperable resistance.

First, consider the earth’s supposed little vortex. It has been proved that this vortex must gradually lose its motion. It has also been proved that if the earth floats in a fluid, the fluid must match the earth’s density. And if their densities are equal, all bodies we try to move must encounter resistance we cannot overcome.

With regard to the great vortices, they are still more chimerical, and it is impossible to make them agree with Kepler’s law, the truth of which has been demonstrated. Sir Isaac shows, that the revolution of the fluid in which Jupiter is supposed to be carried, is not the same with regard to the revolution of the fluid of the earth, as the revolution of Jupiter with respect to that of the earth. He proves, that as the planets make their revolutions in ellipses, and consequently being at a much greater distance one from the other in their Aphelia, and a little nearer in their Perihelia; the earth’s velocity, for instance, ought to be greater when it is nearer Venus and Mars, because the fluid that carries it along, being then more pressed, ought to have a greater motion; and yet it is even then that the earth’s motion is slower.

As for the great vortices, they are even more imaginary. They cannot possibly be reconciled with Kepler’s law, whose truth has been demonstrated. Sir Isaac compares the rotation of the fluid supposedly carrying Jupiter with the rotation of the fluid carrying the earth. He shows that the ratio differs from the ratio between the orbital periods of Jupiter and the earth. He proves that the planets move in ellipses, placing them much farther apart at their aphelia and somewhat closer at their perihelia. The earth, for example, should therefore move faster when nearer Venus and Mars. This is because the fluid carrying the earth would then be more compressed and should move faster. Yet that is precisely when the earth moves more slowly.

He proves that there is no such thing as a celestial matter which goes from west to east since the comets traverse those spaces, sometimes from east to west, and at other times from north to south.

He proves that no celestial matter moves from west to east. This is because comets cross those regions, sometimes from east to west and sometimes from north to south.

In fine, the better to resolve, if possible, every difficulty, he proves, and even by experiments, that it is impossible there should be a plenum; and brings back the vacuum, which Aristotle and Descartes had banished from the world.

Finally, to resolve every difficulty if possible, he proves that a plenum (space completely filled with matter) is impossible. He proves this even through experiments. He thus brings back the vacuum, which Aristotle and Descartes had banished from the world.

Having by these and several other arguments destroyed the Cartesian vortices, he despaired of ever being able to discover whether there is a secret principle in nature which, at the same time, is the cause of the motion of all celestial bodies, and that of gravity on the earth. But being retired in 1666, upon account of the Plague, to a solitude near Cambridge; as he was walking one day in his garden, and saw some fruits fall from a tree, he fell into a profound meditation on that gravity, the cause of which had so long been sought, but in vain, by all the philosophers, whilst the vulgar think there is nothing mysterious in it. He said to himself; that from what height soever in our hemisphere, those bodies might descend, their fall would certainly be in the progression discovered by Galileo; and the spaces they run through would be as the square of the times. Why may not this power which causes heavy bodies to descend, and is the same without any sensible diminution at the remotest distance from the centre of the earth, or on the summits of the highest mountains, why, said Sir Isaac, may not this power extend as high as the moon? And in case its influence reaches so far, is it not very probable that this power retains it in its orbit, and determines its motion? But in case the moon obeys this principle (whatever it be) may we not conclude very naturally that the rest of the planets are equally subject to it? In case this power exists (which besides is proved) it must increase in an inverse ratio of the squares of the distances. All, therefore, that remains is, to examine how far a heavy body, which should fall upon the earth from a moderate height, would go; and how far in the same time, a body which should fall from the orbit of the moon, would descend. To find this, nothing is wanted but the measure of the earth, and the distance of the moon from it.

With these and several other arguments, he had disproved the Cartesian vortices. He then lost hope of ever discovering whether nature contained a hidden principle governing both celestial motion and earthly gravity. But in 1666, the Plague led him to retreat to a secluded place near Cambridge. One day, while walking in his garden, he saw some fruit fall from a tree. He began thinking deeply about gravity. All philosophers had long searched in vain for its cause, while ordinary people saw nothing mysterious about it. He told himself that, from whatever height in our hemisphere these bodies fell, their fall would follow Galileo’s rule. The distances they traveled would be proportional to the squares of the times. The power causing heavy bodies to fall showed no noticeable decrease even farthest from the earth’s center. It remained the same even on the highest mountain peaks. Why, Sir Isaac asked himself, might this power not reach as high as the moon? And if its influence reached that far, was it not very likely to keep the moon in orbit? Might this power also govern the moon’s motion? But if the moon obeyed this principle, whatever the principle might be, could we not draw a natural conclusion? Might the other planets all be equally subject to it? If this power exists, as has also been proved, its strength must increase as the square of the distance decreases. All that remains, then, is to compare two distances. How far would a heavy body fall toward the earth from a moderate height? And how far would a body falling from the moon’s orbit descend in the same time? To find out, we need only the earth’s size and the moon’s distance from the earth.

Thus Sir Isaac Newton reasoned. But at that time the English had but a very imperfect measure of our globe, and depended on the uncertain supposition of mariners, who computed a degree to contain but sixty English miles, whereas it consists in reality of near seventy. As this false computation did not agree with the conclusions which Sir Isaac intended to draw from them, he laid aside this pursuit. A half-learned philosopher, remarkable only for his vanity, would have made the measure of the earth agree, anyhow, with his system. Sir Isaac, however, chose rather to quit the researches he was then engaged in. But after Mr. Picard had measured the earth exactly, by tracing that meridian which redounds so much to the honour of the French, Sir Isaac Newton resumed his former reflections, and found his account in Mr. Picard’s calculation.

This was Sir Isaac Newton’s reasoning. But at the time, the English had only a very rough measurement of the earth. They relied on sailors’ uncertain estimates, which put a degree at only sixty English miles rather than nearly seventy. This incorrect figure did not support the conclusions Sir Isaac hoped to draw, so he set the investigation aside. A half-educated philosopher, known only for his vanity, would somehow have forced the earth’s measurements to fit his theory. Sir Isaac, however, preferred to abandon his research. But later, Mr. Picard measured the earth accurately by tracing the meridian that brings such honor to the French. Sir Isaac Newton then returned to his earlier ideas and found that Mr. Picard’s calculations supported them.

A circumstance which has always appeared wonderful to me, is that such sublime discoveries should have been made by the sole assistance of a quadrant and a little arithmetic.

I have always found it amazing that such great discoveries were made using only a quadrant and a little arithmetic.

The circumference of the earth is 123,249,600 feet. This, among other things, is necessary to prove the system of attraction.

The earth’s circumference is 123,249,600 feet. This measurement, along with other facts, is needed to prove the theory of attraction.

The instant we know the earth’s circumference, and the distance of the moon, we know that of the moon’s orbit, and the diameter of this orbit. The moon performs its revolution in that orbit in twenty-seven days, seven hours, forty-three minutes. It is demonstrated, that the moon in its mean motion makes an hundred and fourscore and seven thousand nine hundred and sixty feet (of Paris) in a minute. It is likewise demonstrated, by a known theorem, that the central force which should make a body fall from the height of the moon, would make its velocity no more than fifteen Paris feet in a minute of time. Now, if the law by which bodies gravitate and attract one another in an inverse ratio to the squares of the distances be true, if the same power acts according to that law throughout all nature, it is evident that as the earth is sixty semi-diameters distant from the moon, a heavy body must necessarily fall (on the earth) fifteen feet in the first second, and fifty-four thousand feet in the first minute.

Once we know the earth’s circumference and the moon’s distance, we know the circumference and diameter of the moon’s orbit. The moon completes one orbit in twenty-seven days, seven hours, and forty-three minutes. It has been demonstrated that the moon’s average motion covers 187,960 Paris feet per minute. A known theorem also demonstrates how fast the central force would make a body fall from the moon’s height. The speed would be no more than fifteen Paris feet per minute. Now, suppose bodies gravitate and attract one another with a force inversely proportional to the square of their distance. If this law is true, and the same force follows this law throughout all nature, the conclusion is clear. Since the moon is sixty earth radii away, a heavy body on earth must fall fifteen feet in the first second. The body must fall 54,000 feet in the first minute.

Now a heavy body falls, in reality, fifteen feet in the first second, and goes in the first minute fifty-four thousand feet, which number is the square of sixty multiplied by fifteen. Bodies, therefore, gravitate in an inverse ratio of the squares of the distances; consequently, what causes gravity on earth, and keeps the moon in its orbit, is one and the same power; it being demonstrated that the moon gravitates on the earth, which is the centre of its particular motion, it is demonstrated that the earth and the moon gravitate on the sun which is the centre of their annual motion.

Now, a heavy body actually falls fifteen feet in the first second and fifty-four thousand feet in the first minute. That distance is sixty squared multiplied by fifteen. Bodies therefore attract one another with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Consequently, the same force causes gravity on earth and keeps the moon in its orbit. The moon has been shown to be drawn toward the earth, the center of the moon’s orbit. It therefore follows that the earth and moon are drawn toward the sun, the center of their yearly orbit.

The rest of the planets must be subject to this general law; and if this law exists, these planets must follow the laws which Kepler discovered. All these laws, all these relations are indeed observed by the planets with the utmost exactness; therefore, the power of attraction causes all the planets to gravitate towards the sun, in like manner as the moon gravitates towards our globe.

The other planets must obey this general law. And if this law exists, these planets must follow the laws Kepler discovered. All the planets do indeed follow all these laws and relationships with the greatest precision. Therefore, attraction pulls all the planets toward the sun, just as it pulls the moon toward the Earth.

Finally, as in all bodies re-action is equal to action, it is certain that the earth gravitates also towards the moon; and that the sun gravitates towards both. That every one of the satellites of Saturn gravitates towards the other four, and the other four towards it; all five towards Saturn, and Saturn towards all. That it is the same with regard to Jupiter; and that all these globes are attracted by the sun, which is reciprocally attracted by them.

Finally, since every action has an equal reaction in all bodies, the earth certainly also gravitates towards the moon. And the sun gravitates towards both the earth and the moon. Each of Saturn’s five moons gravitates towards the other four, and the other four towards that moon. All five gravitate towards Saturn, and Saturn towards all five. The same is true of Jupiter and its moons. And all these bodies are attracted by the sun, while the sun is attracted by them in return.

This power of gravitation acts proportionably to the quantity of matter in bodies, a truth which Sir Isaac has demonstrated by experiments. This new discovery has been of use to show that the sun (the centre of the planetary system) attracts them all in a direct ratio of their quantity of matter combined with their nearness. From hence Sir Isaac, rising by degrees to discoveries which seemed not to be formed for the human mind, is bold enough to compute the quantity of matter contained in the sun and in every planet; and in this manner shows, from the simple laws of mechanics, that every celestial globe ought necessarily to be where it is placed.

The force of gravity acts in proportion to the amount of matter in bodies. Sir Isaac has demonstrated this truth through experiments. This new discovery has helped show how the sun (the centre of the planetary system) attracts all the planets. The sun’s attraction increases in direct proportion to their amount of matter combined with their nearness. From this discovery, Sir Isaac advances step by step to discoveries that seemed beyond the reach of the human mind. He boldly calculates the amount of matter in the sun and in every planet. In this way, he uses the simple laws of mechanics to show why every heavenly body must be exactly where it is.

His bare principle of the laws of gravitation accounts for all the apparent inequalities in the course of the celestial globes. The variations of the moon are a necessary consequence of those laws. Moreover, the reason is evidently seen why the nodes of the moon perform their revolutions in nineteen years, and those of the earth in about twenty-six thousand. The several appearances observed in the tides are also a very simple effect of this attraction. The proximity of the moon, when at the full, and when it is new, and its distance in the quadratures or quarters, combined with the action of the sun, exhibit a sensible reason why the ocean swells and sinks.

His laws of gravity alone explain all the apparent irregularities in the movements of celestial bodies. The variations in the moon’s motion are a necessary consequence of those laws. Moreover, the laws clearly explain why the moon’s nodes complete their cycles in nineteen years. They also explain why the earth’s nodes complete theirs in about twenty-six thousand years. The various patterns observed in the tides are also a very simple effect of gravitational attraction. The moon is closer when full or new, and farther away in its quarter phases. These changes in distance, combined with the sun’s pull, clearly explain why the ocean rises and falls.

After having shown by his sublime theory the course and inequalities of the planets, he subjects comets to the same law. The orbit of these fires (unknown for so great a series of years), which was the terror of mankind and the rock against which philosophy split, placed by Aristotle below the moon, and sent back by Descartes above the sphere of Saturn, is at last placed in its proper seat by Sir Isaac Newton.

After explaining the planets’ paths and irregular movements through his magnificent theory, he brings comets under the same law. The orbits of these fiery bodies had remained unknown for countless years. Comets terrified humanity and were the stumbling block that defeated philosophy. Aristotle placed them below the moon, and Descartes sent them back above the sphere of Saturn. Now Sir Isaac Newton at last puts them in their proper place.

He proves that comets are solid bodies which move in the sphere of the sun’s activity, and that they describe an ellipsis so very eccentric, and so near to parabolas, that certain comets must take up above five hundred years in their revolution.

He proves that comets are solid bodies moving within the sun’s sphere of influence. Their orbits are such elongated ellipses, so close to parabolas, that some comets must take over five hundred years to complete one orbit.

The learned Dr. Halley is of opinion that the comet seen in 1680 is the same which appeared in Julius Cæsar’s time. This shows more than any other that comets are hard, opaque bodies; for it descended so near to the sun, as to come within a sixth part of the diameter of this planet from it, and consequently might have contracted a degree of heat two thousand times stronger than that of red-hot iron; and would have been soon dispersed in vapour, had it not been a firm, dense body. The guessing the course of comets began then to be very much in vogue. The celebrated Bernoulli concluded by his system that the famous comet of 1680 would appear again the 17th of May, 1719. Not a single astronomer in Europe went to bed that night. However, they needed not to have broke their rest, for the famous comet never appeared. There is at least more cunning, if not more certainty, in fixing its return to so remote a distance as five hundred and seventy-five years. As to Mr. Whiston, he affirmed very seriously that in the time of the Deluge a comet overflowed the terrestrial globe. And he was so unreasonable as to wonder that people laughed at him for making such an assertion. The ancients were almost in the same way of thinking with Mr. Whiston, and fancied that comets were always the forerunners of some great calamity which was to befall mankind. Sir Isaac Newton, on the contrary, suspected that they are very beneficent, and that vapours exhale from them merely to nourish and vivify the planets, which imbibe in their course the several particles the sun has detached from the comets, an opinion which, at least, is more probable than the former. But this is not all. If this power of gravitation or attraction acts on all the celestial globes, it acts undoubtedly on the several parts of these globes. For in case bodies attract one another in proportion to the quantity of matter contained in them, it can only be in proportion to the quantity of their parts; and if this power is found in the whole, it is undoubtedly in the half; in the quarters in the eighth part, and so on in infinitum.

The learned Dr. Halley believes that the comet seen in 1680 is the same one that appeared in Julius Cæsar’s time. This comet shows better than any other that comets are hard, opaque bodies. For it came within one-sixth of the sun’s diameter of the sun itself. It might therefore have reached a temperature two thousand times hotter than red-hot iron. It would soon have dissolved into vapor if it had not been a solid, dense body. Predicting the paths of comets then became very fashionable. The celebrated Bernoulli concluded from his system that the famous comet of 1680 would return on May 17, 1719. Not a single astronomer in Europe went to bed that night. But they need not have lost any sleep, for the famous comet never appeared. There is at least more cunning, if not more certainty, in predicting its return five hundred and seventy-five years away. As for Mr. Whiston, he declared quite seriously that a comet flooded the earth at the time of the Deluge. And he was unreasonable enough to wonder why people laughed at him for saying so. The ancients thought much as Mr. Whiston did. They imagined that comets always foretold some great disaster about to strike humanity. Sir Isaac Newton, by contrast, suspected that comets do a great deal of good. He thought vapors rose from comets solely to nourish and give life to the planets. As the planets traveled, they absorbed the various particles that the sun had drawn away from the comets. This opinion, at least, is more plausible than the earlier one. But that is not all. If this force of gravity or attraction acts on all heavenly bodies, it undoubtedly acts on their separate parts. For if bodies attract one another in proportion to their amount of matter, their attraction must depend on their parts. And if this force exists in the whole, it undoubtedly exists in half of it. It exists in quarters, in eighths, and so on to infinity.

This is attraction, the great spring by which all Nature is moved. Sir Isaac Newton, after having demonstrated the existence of this principle, plainly foresaw that its very name would offend; and, therefore, this philosopher, in more places than one of his books, gives the reader some caution about it. He bids him beware of confounding this name with what the ancients called occult qualities, but to be satisfied with knowing that there is in all bodies a central force, which acts to the utmost limits of the universe, according to the invariable laws of mechanics.

This is attraction, the great driving force that moves all Nature. After proving that this principle exists, Sir Isaac Newton clearly foresaw that its very name would offend. So, in several places in his books, Newton warns the reader about the term. He tells the reader not to confuse attraction with what the ancients called occult qualities. Instead, the reader should be content to know that all bodies have a central force. This force acts to the farthest limits of the universe, following the unchanging laws of mechanics.

It is surprising, after the solemn protestations Sir Isaac made, that such eminent men as Mr. Sorin and Mr. de Fontenelle should have imputed to this great philosopher the verbal and chimerical way of reasoning of the Aristotelians; Mr. Sorin in the Memoirs of the Academy of 1709, and Mr. de Fontenelle in the very eulogium of Sir Isaac Newton.

Given Sir Isaac’s solemn denials, it is surprising that such eminent men as Mr. Sorin and Mr. de Fontenelle misrepresented him. They attributed to this great philosopher the Aristotelians’ way of reasoning, based on words and imaginary ideas. Mr. Sorin did so in the Memoirs of the Academy of 1709. Mr. de Fontenelle did so in his very tribute to Sir Isaac Newton.

Most of the French (the learned and others) have repeated this reproach. These are for ever crying out, “Why did he not employ the word impulsion, which is so well understood, rather than that of attraction, which is unintelligible?”

Most French people (scholars and others) have repeated this criticism. They are forever complaining, “Why did he not use the word impulsion, which is so well understood? Why use the incomprehensible word attraction instead?”

Sir Isaac might have answered these critics thus:—“First, you have as imperfect an idea of the word impulsion as of that of attraction; and in case you cannot conceive how one body tends towards the centre of another body, neither can you conceive by what power one body can impel another.

Sir Isaac might have answered these critics like this: “First, your understanding of the word ‘push’ is just as incomplete as your understanding of ‘attraction.’ If you cannot understand how one body moves toward the center of another, neither can you understand what power allows one body to push another.

“Secondly, I could not admit of impulsion; for to do this I must have known that a celestial matter was the agent. But so far from knowing that there is any such matter, I have proved it to be merely imaginary.

“Secondly, I could not accept pushing as the cause. To accept that explanation, I would have needed to know that celestial matter was responsible. But far from knowing that such matter exists, I have proved that celestial matter is purely imaginary.

“Thirdly, I use the word attraction for no other reason but to express an effect which I discovered in Nature—a certain and indisputable effect of an unknown principle—a quality inherent in matter, the cause of which persons of greater abilities than I can pretend to may, if they can, find out.”

“Thirdly, I use the word attraction only to describe an effect I discovered in Nature. This effect is certain and beyond dispute, but the principle behind it is unknown. Attraction is a quality inherent in matter. People with greater abilities than I can claim may discover its cause, if they can.”

“What have you, then, taught us?” will these people say further; “and to what purpose are so many calculations to tell us what you yourself do not comprehend?”

“What, then, have you taught us?” these people will go on to ask. “And what good are so many calculations if they tell us what you yourself do not understand?”

“I have taught you,” may Sir Isaac rejoin, “that all bodies gravitate towards one another in proportion to their quantity of matter; that these central forces alone keep the planets and comets in their orbits, and cause them to move in the proportion before set down. I demonstrate to you that it is impossible there should be any other cause which keeps the planets in their orbits than that general phenomenon of gravity. For heavy bodies fall on the earth according to the proportion demonstrated of central forces; and the planets finishing their course according to these same proportions, in case there were another power that acted upon all those bodies, it would either increase their velocity or change their direction. Now, not one of those bodies ever has a single degree of motion or velocity, or has any direction but what is demonstrated to be the effect of the central forces. Consequently it is impossible there should be any other principle.”

“I have taught you,” Sir Isaac may reply, “that all bodies attract one another in proportion to their amount of matter. These central forces alone keep the planets and comets in their orbits. These forces also make them move according to the proportions described earlier. I prove to you that nothing but the general phenomenon of gravity can keep the planets in their orbits. For heavy bodies fall to earth according to the proportions shown to govern central forces. And the planets complete their orbits according to these same proportions. If another force acted on all these bodies, that force would either increase their speed or change their direction. Yet none of these bodies has any motion, speed, or direction beyond what central forces are proven to produce. So no other principle can possibly be at work.”

Give me leave once more to introduce Sir Isaac speaking. Shall he not be allowed to say? “My case and that of the ancients is very different. These saw, for instance, water ascend in pumps, and said, ‘The water rises because it abhors a vacuum.’ But with regard to myself; I am in the case of a man who should have first observed that water ascends in pumps, but should leave others to explain the cause of this effect. The anatomist, who first declared that the motion of the arm is owing to the contraction of the muscles, taught mankind an indisputable truth. But are they less obliged to him because he did not know the reason why the muscles contract? The cause of the elasticity of the air is unknown, but he who first discovered this spring performed a very signal service to natural philosophy. The spring that I discovered was more hidden and more universal, and for that very reason mankind ought to thank me the more. I have discovered a new property of matter—one of the secrets of the Creator—and have calculated and discovered the effects of it. After this, shall people quarrel with me about the name I give it?”

Let me once again imagine Sir Isaac speaking. Should he not be allowed to say: “My case is very different from that of the ancients. They saw water rise in pumps, for example, and said, ‘Water rises because it abhors a vacuum.’ But I am like a man who first noticed that water rises in pumps, leaving others to explain why. The anatomist who first explained that muscle contractions move the arm taught humanity an undeniable truth. But do people owe him any less because he did not know why muscles contract? The cause of air’s elasticity is unknown. But whoever first discovered that elasticity did a great service to natural philosophy. The force I discovered was harder to detect and more universal. For that very reason, humanity should thank me all the more. I have discovered a new property of matter, one of the Creator’s secrets. I have also calculated and discovered its effects. After all this, should people argue with me about the name I give this property?”

Vortices may be called an occult quality, because their existence was never proved. Attraction, on the contrary, is a real thing, because its effects are demonstrated, and the proportions of it are calculated. The cause of this cause is among the Arcana of the Almighty.

Vortices may be called a hidden property of nature, because their existence has never been proved. Attraction, by contrast, is real, because its effects have been demonstrated and its strength calculated. The cause of attraction is among the secrets of the Almighty.

(Thus far shalt thou go, and no farther.)

(You may go this far, but no farther.)